Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2003 May-Jun;40(3):213-24.

Postoperative dressing and management strategies for transtibial amputations: a critical review

Affiliations
  • PMID: 14582525
Review

Postoperative dressing and management strategies for transtibial amputations: a critical review

Douglas G Smith et al. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2003 May-Jun.

Abstract

Postamputation management is an important determinant of recovery from amputation. However, consensus on the most effective postoperative management strategies for individuals undergoing transtibial amputation (TTA) is lacking. Dressings can include simple soft gauze dressings, thigh-high rigid cast dressings, shorter removable rigid dressings, and prefabricated pneumatic dressings. Postoperative prosthetic attachments can be added to all but simple soft dressings. These dressings address the need to cleanly cover a fresh surgical wound, but not all postoperative dressings are designed to facilitate the strategic goals of preventing knee contractures, reducing edema, protecting from external trauma, or facilitating early weight bearing. The type of dressing and management strategy often overlap and are certainly interrelated. Current protocols and decisions are based on local practice, skill, and intuition. The current available literature is challenging, and difficulties include variations in healing potential, in comorbidity, in surgical-level selection, in techniques and skill, in experience with postoperative strategies, and with poorly defined outcome criteria. This paper reviews the published literature and compares measures of safety, efficacy, and clinical outcomes of the various techniques. Analysis of 10 controlled studies supported only 4 of the 14 claims cited in uncontrolled, descriptive studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Transtibial amputation management.
    Payne MW, Marks MB. Payne MW, et al. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2003 Nov-Dec;40(6):xvi-xvii; author reply xvii. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2003. PMID: 15077657 No abstract available.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources