Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2003;27(5):397-404.
doi: 10.1016/s0361-090x(03)00103-x.

Comparison of methods for DNA extraction from paraffin-embedded tissues and buccal cells

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of methods for DNA extraction from paraffin-embedded tissues and buccal cells

Wei Cao et al. Cancer Detect Prev. 2003.

Abstract

Both paraffin-embedded tissue specimens and buccal cells are excellent resources for large-scale molecular epidemiological studies. In order to identify the optimal method for DNA extraction, we compared three methods: (1) modified phenol-chloroform protocol; (2) simple boiling method; and (3) DNA Extraction Mini Kit. For paraffin-embedded tissue specimens, amplification of the beta-globin gene sequence was successful in 30 of 34 (88.2%) by the simple boiling method, 29 of 34 (85.3%) samples using DNA extracted by the phenol-chloroform method, and 18 of 34 (52.9%) by the DNA Mini Kit. For buccal cells, amplification of the beta-globin gene sequence was successful in 16 of 17 (94.1%) DNA samples extracted by the phenol-chloroform method, 2 of 16 (12.5%) by the simple boiling method, and 12 of 16 (75%) by the DNA Mini Kit. Both the simple boiling method and the phenol-chloroform method are better methods for DNA isolation from paraffin-embedded tissue specimens, and the phenol-chloroform method is the best method for DNA extraction from buccal cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources