Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Oct 29;23(30):9812-6.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-30-09812.2003.

Dynamic interaction of object- and space-based attention in retinotopic visual areas

Affiliations

Dynamic interaction of object- and space-based attention in retinotopic visual areas

Notger G Müller et al. J Neurosci. .

Abstract

We investigated the interaction between object- and space-based attention by measuring activity in early visual cortex. After central cueing, when subjects directed attention to a spatially defined part of an object, activity in early visual areas was enhanced at corresponding retinotopic representations but also at representations of other locations covered by the object. Different from the assumption of automatic attentional "spreading" within an object, however, activity was greater for representations of cued than of uncued locations on the same object. These findings support an interaction of object-based spatial selection with object-independent spatial mechanisms in directing attention. When the target stimulus did not appear at the expected location, we found higher activation in areas representing other locations on the same object than equidistant locations on other objects. Objects, hence, also guide spatial search, and this may account for the behaviorally observed delay in processing parts of an unattended object.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Experimental design and conditions. a, Presentation scheme (stimuli not to scale). b, Experimental conditions during cueing. Arrows indicate for which locations activity in corresponding retinotopic representations was assessed. Depending on vertical or horizontal orientation of the objects, the bottom left and top right locations belonged to either the cued object or the uncued object, respectively. c, Experimental conditions during target processing. Trials in which the slit appeared at the cued top left corner are referred to as valid. Only trials in which the slit did not appear at the respective location were analyzed for the corresponding representations. This avoided confounding by sensory input processing.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Neural activity in early visual areas during cueing and target search. ROI were defined as retinotopic representations of the locations depicted in Figure 1, a and b. a, Event-related activity in response to the spatial cue. Single-subject data are shown on a flattened cortical reconstruction. When the objects were oriented vertically, the bottom left representation coded the uncued/same object location and the top right representation coded the uncued/different object location, and vice versa with horizontal objects. Accordingly, a same-object advantage for uncued locations would manifest as higher amplitude for the blue curve at the bottom left representation and for the red curve at the top right representation. b, Reaction times for correct answers. c, Group-averaged peak BOLD responses to the cue at ROI representing the cued and the uncued locations. d, Group-averaged peak BOLD responses during target processing in valid and invalid trials at ROI representing the uncued locations.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abrams RA, Law MB ( 2000) Object-based visual attention with endogenous orienting. Percept Psychophys 62: 818–833. - PubMed
    1. Avrahami J ( 1999) Objects of attention, objects of perception. Percept Psychophys 61: 1604–1612. - PubMed
    1. Awh E, Dhaliwal H, Christensen S, Matsukura M ( 2001) Evidence for two components of object-based selection. Psychol Sci 12: 329–334. - PubMed
    1. Baylis GC, Driver J ( 1993) Visual attention and objects: evidence for hierarchical coding of location. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 19: 451–470. - PubMed
    1. Brefczynski JA, DeYoe EA ( 1999) A physiological correlate of the “spotlight” of visual attention. Nat Neurosci 2: 370–374. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources