Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Oct;189(4):919-24.
doi: 10.1067/s0002-9378(03)00839-1.

The clinical significance of detecting Ureaplasma urealyticum by the polymerase chain reaction in the amniotic fluid of patients with preterm labor

Bo Hyun Yoon  1 , Roberto Romero, June-Hee Lim, Soon-Sup Shim, Joon-Seok Hong, Jae-Yoon Shim, Jong Kwan Jun
Affiliations

The clinical significance of detecting Ureaplasma urealyticum by the polymerase chain reaction in the amniotic fluid of patients with preterm labor

Bo Hyun Yoon et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: This study was undertaken to determine the clinical significance of a detection of Ureaplasma urealyticum by using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the amniotic fluid of patients with preterm labor and intact membranes.

Study design: Amniocentesis was performed in 257 patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Amniotic fluid was cultured for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria as well as genital mycoplasmas. U urealyticum was detected by PCR using specific primers. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the results of amniotic fluid culture and PCR for U urealyticum: those with a negative culture and negative PCR (n=228), those with a negative culture but positive PCR (n=6), and those with a positive culture regardless of the results of PCR (n=23).

Results: The prevalence of positive amniotic fluid culture was 9% (23 of 257). U urealyticum was detected by PCR in 6% (15 of 254) of cases. Of the 15 cases with positive PCR for U urealyticum, amniotic fluid culture was negative in 40% (6 of 15). Patients with a negative culture but positive PCR for U urealyticum had significantly shorter median amniocentesis-to-delivery interval and higher amniotic fluid interleukin-6 and white blood cell count than those with a negative amniotic fluid culture and negative PCR (P<.01 for each). Patients with a positive PCR for U urealyticum but a negative amniotic fluid culture had a higher rate of significant neonatal morbidity than those with a negative culture and negative PCR (P<.05). However, no significant differences in perinatal outcome were observed between patients with a negative culture but positive PCR and those with a positive amniotic fluid culture.

Conclusion: Patients with preterm labor and a positive PCR for U urealyticum but negative amniotic fluid culture are at risk for impending preterm delivery and adverse perinatal outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types