Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2003 Oct;189(4):925-9.
doi: 10.1067/s0002-9378(03)01056-1.

Uterine rupture, perioperative and perinatal morbidity after single-layer and double-layer closure at cesarean delivery

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Uterine rupture, perioperative and perinatal morbidity after single-layer and double-layer closure at cesarean delivery

Celeste Durnwald et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: This study was undertaken to evaluate the risks and benefits of single-layer uterine closure at cesarean delivery on the index and subsequent pregnancy.

Study design: A retrospective study of women delivered of their first live-born infants by primary low transverse cesarean delivery (1989-2001) and their subsequent pregnancy at our institution was performed.

Results: Of 768 women studied, 267 had single-layer and 501 had double-layer uterine closures in the index pregnancy. Single-layer closure was associated with slightly decreased blood loss (646 vs 690 mL, P<.01), operative time (46 vs 52 minutes, P<.001), endometritis (13.5% vs 25.5%, P<.001), and postoperative stay (3.5 vs 4.1 days, P<.001). In the second pregnancy, prior single-layer closure was not associated with uterine rupture after a trial of labor (0% vs 1.2%, P=.30), or other maternal or infant morbidities. Prior single-layer closure was associated with increased uterine windows (3.5% vs 0.7%, P=.046) at subsequent cesarean delivery.

Conclusion: Single-layer uterine closure is associated with decreased infectious morbidity in the index surgery, but not uterine rupture or other adverse outcomes in the subsequent gestation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • The uterine 1-layer closure.
    Escamilla JO. Escamilla JO. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Oct;191(4):1503; author reply 1503-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.04.033. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004. PMID: 15507992 No abstract available.

Publication types