Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2003 Oct;84(10):1473-9.
doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00359-9.

Shoulder kinematics in subjects with frozen shoulder

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Shoulder kinematics in subjects with frozen shoulder

Peter J Rundquist et al. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: To describe 3-dimensional humeral motion in subjects with frozen shoulder and to determine whether a consistent capsular pattern of restriction was present.

Design: Descriptive study including repeated measurements of shoulder kinematics.

Setting: Motion-analysis laboratory.

Participants: Ten (9 women, 1 man) volunteers with a diagnosis of idiopathic adhesive capsulitis and 10 (9 women, 1 man) subjects with asymptomatic shoulders as comparison subjects.

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main outcome measures: Electromagnetic tracking sensors monitored the 3-dimensional position of the trunk, scapula, and humerus throughout active shoulder motions. Peak humeral positions relative to the trunk and scapula were determined for shoulder flexion, abduction, scapular plane abduction, external rotation (ER), and internal rotation (IR). Descriptive statistics (means, standard deviations, percentage of normal) were calculated and capsular patterns described.

Results: For humeral position relative to the trunk, subjects' mean peak motion was as follows: abduction, 98.4 degrees; ER at the side, 4.5 degrees; ER with the arm abducted, 33.5 degrees; flexion, 116.9 degrees; IR at the side, 54.3 degrees; IR with the arm abducted, 17.8 degrees; and scapular plane abduction, 113.4 degrees. For humeral position relative to the scapula, subjects' mean peak motion was as follows: abduction, 46.4 degrees; ER at the side, 34.7 degrees; ER with the arm abducted, 45.3 degrees; flexion, 70.5 degrees; IR at the side, 10.3 degrees; IR with the arm abducted, -6.4 degrees; and scapular plane abduction, 61.7 degrees.

Conclusions: Symptomatic subjects demonstrated substantial kinematic deficits during humeral range of motion. No single capsular pattern emerged.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources