Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2003 Nov;93(11):1837-43.
doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.11.1837.

Effects of a social-network method for group assignment strategies on peer-led tobacco prevention programs in schools

Thomas W Valente  1 , Beth R Hoffman, Annamara Ritt-Olson, Kara Lichtman, C Anderson Johnson
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Effects of a social-network method for group assignment strategies on peer-led tobacco prevention programs in schools

Thomas W Valente et al. Am J Public Health. 2003 Nov.

Abstract

Objectives: Our study tested the effectiveness of network methods for identifying opinion leaders and for constructing groups.

Methods: Three conditions-random, teacher, and network--ere randomly assigned to 84 6th-grade classrooms within 16 schools. Pre- and postcurriculum data on mediators of tobacco use were collected from 1961 students. Peer leaders in the network condition were identified by student nominations, and those leaders were matched with the students who nominated them.

Results: Students in the network condition relative to the random condition liked the prevention program more and had improved attitudes (beta = -0.06; P <.01), improved self-efficacy (beta = -0.10; P <.001), and decreased intention to smoke (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.38, 0.55).

Conclusions: The network method was the most effective way to structure the program. Future programs may refine this technique and use it in other settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1—
FIGURE 1—
Group assignments for 1 class. Note. One hundred nineteen links are not shown because they did not result in group assignments.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

  • Social networks and peer education.
    Wiist WH. Wiist WH. Am J Public Health. 2004 Aug;94(8):1293; author reply 1293-4. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.8.1293. Am J Public Health. 2004. PMID: 15284025 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Youth tobacco surveillance—United States, 1998–1999. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss4910a1.htm. Accessed January 15, 2002. - PubMed
    1. Lynch BS, Bonnie R. Growing Up Tobacco Free: Preventing Nicotine Addiction in Children and Youths. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999. - PubMed
    1. Botvin GJ, Griffin K, Diaz T, Scheier L, Williams C, Epstein J. Preventing illicit drug use in adolescents: long-term follow-up data from a randomized control trial of a school population. Addict Behav. 2000;25:769–774. - PubMed
    1. Botvin GJ, Baker E, Dusenbury L, Botvin E, Diaz T. Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in a white middle-class population. JAMA. 1995;273:1106–1112. - PubMed
    1. Botvin GJ, Dusenbury L, Baker E, James-Ortiz S, Botvin E, Kerner J. Smoking prevention among urban minority youth: assessing effects on outcomes and mediating variables. Health Psychol. 1992;11:290–299. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms