Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Oct;29(10):1924-31.
doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(03)00214-1.

Pupil size and the ablation zone in laser refractive surgery: considerations based on geometric optics

Kenn A Freedman  1 , Sandra M Brown, Steven M Mathews, Rockefeller S L Young
Affiliations

Pupil size and the ablation zone in laser refractive surgery: considerations based on geometric optics

Kenn A Freedman et al. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether the currently accepted method of selecting a minimum ablation zone size for refractive surgery based on dark-adapted pupil diameter is substantiated by geometric optical analysis.

Setting: Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA.

Methods: An optical model of the anterior segment was developed to calculate the effective corneal refractive diameter (ECRD), which is the diameter of the area of cornea that refracts all incident light rays arising from objects along the line of sight though the physical pupil (PP). The concept of the entrance pupil (EP) was reexamined and developed, and the ECRD was calculated over a range of corneal curvatures (K), anterior chamber depths (ACDs), and EP sizes. The model was generalized to include oblique light rays. Calculations were performed using MatLab Optimization Toolbox software (The MathWorks).

Results: For a given EP size, the ECRD was significantly influenced by K and slightly influenced by ACD.

Conclusions: For objects on the line of sight, the ECRD was smaller than the EP in all cases. Regarding rays from objects in the periphery, the ECRD expanded rapidly as the angle of oblique incidence increased. For objects on the line of sight, the ECRD is always smaller than the clinically measured pupil (EP) because the EP is substantially magnified relative to the PP. Ablation zones larger than the EP should, in theory, prevent scattered or defocused light rays from contributing to the foveal image. When considering objects in the periphery, the increase in ECRD is sufficiently rapid that current refractive procedures cannot stop scattered light from these objects from contributing to the retinal image.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in