Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2003 Nov;74(11):1009-17.
doi: 10.1007/s00104-003-0765-9.

[Distal radius fractures. 2.4 mm locking compression plates. Are they worth the effort?]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
Comparative Study

[Distal radius fractures. 2.4 mm locking compression plates. Are they worth the effort?]

[Article in German]
A Schupp et al. Chirurg. 2003 Nov.

Abstract

Fracture of the distal radius has a second peak of incidence in the second half of life. Because complex injuries are seen frequently, there is a need for differentiated treatment to achieve good results. The aim of our study was to evaluate the treatment of distal radius fractures with 2.4-mm locking compression (LC) plates in patients older than 65 years suffering from osteoporosis to determine the complications and compare costs of treatment with different interventions. Thirty-seven patients were included in this prospective study. The distribution of fractures according to AO classification was: nine type A, one type B, and 27 type C. The mean age was 76 years. Twenty-six volar plates, seven dorsal and four "sandwich" procedures were applied. The mean follow-up for 33 patients was 11.1 months. Using the functional Lidström score, we found 13 very good results, 15 good, four fair, and one poor, the radiologic Lidström scores were: 15 very good, 13 good, four fair, and one poor results. With the application of 2.4-mm LC plates, findings were good or very good in over 80%of osteoporotic distal radial fractures. Compared to other treatments, the real costs of intervention for LC plates is much higher.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1999 Dec;85(8):828-33 - PubMed
    1. Clin Radiol. 1967 Jan;18(1):101-8 - PubMed
    1. J Hand Surg Br. 1996 Dec;21(6):768-71 - PubMed
    1. Arthroscopy. 1990;6(2):125-32 - PubMed
    1. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl II Verh Dtsch Ges Chir. 1990;:639-42 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources