A unicompartmental knee replacement is not "half a total knee": five major differences
- PMID: 1461671
A unicompartmental knee replacement is not "half a total knee": five major differences
Abstract
Unicompartmental knee replacement surgery has known uneven success. It fell out of favor in the late 1970s as it was gradually replaced by total knee arthroplasty. The failures of unicompartmental replacements were due partly to the implants themselves but largely to incomplete knowledge of the principles and techniques associated with the unicompartmental knee replacement procedure. As newer implants become available, it is easy to focus on the technology at the expense of basic principles. The authors elaborate on five key principles that differentiate unicompartmental knee replacement from total knee arthroplasty.
Similar articles
-
Bicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee.Instr Course Lect. 2010;59:61-73. Instr Course Lect. 2010. PMID: 20415368
-
Unicompartmental mobile-bearing knee arthroplasty.Instr Course Lect. 2005;54:221-4. Instr Course Lect. 2005. PMID: 15948449 Review.
-
Revision total knee arthroplasty after failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty or high tibial osteotomy.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Dec;(321):10-8. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995. PMID: 7497653 Clinical Trial.
-
Failure mechanisms of unicompartmental knee replacement: the impact of changes in operative technique and component design.Semin Arthroplasty. 1991 Jan;2(1):23-8. Semin Arthroplasty. 1991. PMID: 10150059 Review.
-
Long-term results of the Manchester knee. Surface arthroplasty of the tibiofemoral joint.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 May;(278):138-46. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992. PMID: 1563144
Cited by
-
[Medial unicondylar knee replacement].Orthopade. 2014 Oct;43(10):875-6, 878-82. doi: 10.1007/s00132-014-3012-9. Orthopade. 2014. PMID: 25227530 German.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Research Materials