Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2003 Dec:196:75-84.
doi: 10.1046/j.1600-065x.2003.00089.x.

The balance of deletion and regulation in allograft tolerance

Affiliations
Review

The balance of deletion and regulation in allograft tolerance

Xin Xiao Zheng et al. Immunol Rev. 2003 Dec.

Abstract

Although the precise mechanisms involved in the establishment and maintenance of peripheral allograft tolerance are still not fully understood, it is now clear that acquisition of transplantation tolerance is an active, highly regulated, multistep process. According to the pool size model of allograft tolerance, the allograft outcome, rejection, or tolerance, often depends on the balance between cytopathic and regulatory T cells (Tregs). Although both deletion and regulation play important roles in allograft tolerance, our recent studies showed that the quantitative details for each mechanism differ from model to model. Therefore, we hypothesize that there is a delicate balance between deletion and regulation in allograft tolerance. In a model of allograft tolerance in which the deletional mechanism plays a dominant role, e.g. tolerance produced via creation of mixed chimeras, the regulatory mechanism, albeit sometimes present, is far less important. Whilst in a model in which the regulation mechanism plays a critical role, e.g. donor-specific transfusion plus MR1-induced allograft tolerance, a deletional mechanism lowers the threshold for effective Treg action.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources