Internal cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation using rectilinear biphasic waveform
- PMID: 14618059
- DOI: 10.1023/a:1027403729049
Internal cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation using rectilinear biphasic waveform
Abstract
Internal electrical cardioversion is currently used in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation resistant to external electrical cardioversion. In external cardioversion, biphasic waveforms have shown a greater efficacy than monomorphic waveforms. The present study aimed to test the safety and efficacy of rectilinear biphasic waveform in converting patients with persistent atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm using internal electrical cardioversion, and to compare it with that of classical monophasic waveform. Twenty-seven consecutive patients with persistent AF received 31 internal cardioversions, using monophasic waveform in 11 (group I), and rectilinear biphasic waveform in 20 cases (group II). Baseline patients characteristics were similar in both groups. Multipolar catheters were positioned in the distal coronary sinus and in the high right atrium. Synchronised shocks were delivered using an escalating protocol of 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, and 50 Joules. In group I, 1 patient was resistant to maximal energy (success rate 91%). The mean energy of the maximal shock was 18 +/- 13 J. In group II, all patients were converted to sinus rhythm. The mean energy of the maximal shock was 9 +/- 5 J (p < 0.01 vs. group I). No significant complications occurred. At 3 months follow-up, 45% of group I and 60% of group II patients remained in sinus rhythm (p = NS). We conclude that internal cardioversion using rectilinear biphasic waveform is feasible and safe, and requires less energy than classical monophasic waveforms.
Similar articles
-
[Transthoracic cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation: comparison of three different waveforms].Ital Heart J Suppl. 2004 Jan;5(1):36-43. Ital Heart J Suppl. 2004. PMID: 15253143 Clinical Trial. Italian.
-
[Ambulatory electrocardioversion of atrial fibrillation by means of biphasic versus monophasic shock delivery. A prospective randomized study].Z Kardiol. 2004 May;93(5):381-7. doi: 10.1007/s00392-004-0061-9. Z Kardiol. 2004. PMID: 15160273 Clinical Trial. German.
-
Comparison of monophasic and biphasic shocks for transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.Heart. 2003 Sep;89(9):1032-4. doi: 10.1136/heart.89.9.1032. Heart. 2003. PMID: 12923020 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Monophasic and biphasic shock for transthoracic conversion of atrial fibrillation: Systematic review and network meta-analysis.Resuscitation. 2016 Mar;100:66-75. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.12.009. Epub 2016 Jan 8. Resuscitation. 2016. PMID: 26777209
-
Techniques improving electrical cardioversion success for patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Europace. 2023 Feb 16;25(2):318-330. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac199. Europace. 2023. PMID: 36503970 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Internal atrial and ventricular defibrillation during electrophysiology procedures.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2005 Aug;13 Suppl 1:71-8. doi: 10.1007/s10840-005-0753-8. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2005. PMID: 16133859
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous