Recombinant FSH vs. urinary FSH for ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization
- PMID: 14619648
Recombinant FSH vs. urinary FSH for ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization
Abstract
Objective: To compare ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH (rFSH) vs. urinary FSH (uFSH) in terms of hormonal events within ovarian follicles and the outcome of in vitro fertilization.
Study design: A prospective randomized comparative study of rFSH (n = 70) vs. uFSH (n = 61) ovarian stimulation. Hormone determinations were serum estradiol (E2) on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration, and E2, androstenedione (A) and testosterone (T) at the time of follicular aspiration in the follicular fluid and serum.
Results: The total dose of gonadotropins required and the length of ovarian stimulation were the same in the 2 groups. In follicular fluid the E2 and the A levels were significantly higher in the rFSH group (3,065 +/- 1,646 vs. 2,368 +/- 1,240 nmol/L, P = .004, and 103.7 +/- 51.6 vs. 89.0 +/- 42.3 nmol/L, P = .042, respectively), whereas A:E2 and T:E2 ratios were significantly lower (39.6 +/- 22.5 vs. 52.3 +/- 59.6, P = .042, and 9.1 +/- 4.7 vs. 17.6 +/- 26.9, P = .006, respectively). Serum hormonal levels, number of oocytes retrieved and pregnancy rates did not differ significantly between the groups.
Conclusion: rFSH provides results similar to those of uFSH. rFSH enhances steroidogenesis and provokes different androgen/estrogen ratios than does uFSH without influencing the outcome of in vitro fertilization.
Similar articles
-
Endocrine profile in serum and follicular fluid differs after ovarian stimulation with HP-hMG or recombinant FSH in IVF patients.Hum Reprod. 2007 Mar;22(3):676-87. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del445. Epub 2006 Nov 16. Hum Reprod. 2007. PMID: 17110397 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in improving oocyte quality in assisted reproductive techniques.J Reprod Med. 2004 Sep;49(9):733-8. J Reprod Med. 2004. PMID: 15493565 Clinical Trial.
-
Pharmacokinetics and follicular dynamics of corifollitropin alfa versus recombinant FSH during ovarian stimulation for IVF.Reprod Biomed Online. 2010 Nov;21(5):593-601. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.06.032. Epub 2010 Jun 30. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010. PMID: 20843746 Clinical Trial.
-
Updated meta-analysis of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) versus urinary FSH for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction.Fertil Steril. 2002 Apr;77(4):711-4. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)03246-0. Fertil Steril. 2002. PMID: 11937121
-
Recombinant gonadotropins.Curr Womens Health Rep. 2001 Oct;1(2):157-63. Curr Womens Health Rep. 2001. PMID: 12112963 Review.
Cited by
-
Recombinant versus urinary gonadotrophin for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technology cycles.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Feb 16;2011(2):CD005354. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005354.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011. PMID: 21328276 Free PMC article.
-
The therapeutic effects of rFSH versus uFSH/uHMG on ovarian stimulation in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Jun;309(6):2529-2555. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07095-5. Epub 2023 Jul 20. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024. PMID: 37470817
-
Controlled ovarian stimulation protocols for assisted reproduction: a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 1;7(7):CD012586. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012586.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025. PMID: 40590303 Review.