Movement and lexical access: do noniconic gestures aid in retrieval?
- PMID: 14620354
- DOI: 10.3758/bf03196522
Movement and lexical access: do noniconic gestures aid in retrieval?
Abstract
The production of meaningful gestures has been claimed to enhance lexical access. However, the possibility that meaningless movements also improve retrieval has been largely ignored despite evidence that all types of movements increase with dysfluency. To examine this issue, we conducted two experiments to determine whether movements in general would improve lexical access in a tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) paradigm. TOT states were induced by presenting definitions of rare words that participants were then asked to recall. Participants who were required to tap at their own pace while retrieving words obtained significantly higher resolution rates than those who were immobile. Thus, movement does not have to be semantically related to the lexical item in order to aid in retrieval. However, tapping did not improve lexical access in all retrieval tasks. In a lexical retrieval task that relied more on executive abilities (letter fluency), participants who tapped retrieved fewer words than those who were immobile. The fact that movement enhanced lexical access only when retrieval depended on the automatic spread of activation suggests that facilitation may occur because of the activation of neural areas common to both speech and movement.
Similar articles
-
Gesture Helps, Only If You Need It: Inhibiting Gesture Reduces Tip-of-the-Tongue Resolution for Those With Weak Short-Term Memory.Cogn Sci. 2021 Jan;45(1):e12914. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12914. Cogn Sci. 2021. PMID: 33389787 Free PMC article.
-
An experimental investigation of the role of iconic gestures in lexical access using the tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon.Br J Psychol. 1999 Feb;90 ( Pt 1):35-56. doi: 10.1348/000712699161251. Br J Psychol. 1999. PMID: 10085545
-
Retrieval of lexical-syntactic features in tip-of-the-tongue states.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1997 Nov;23(6):1410-23. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.23.6.1410. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1997. PMID: 9372608
-
Stages of lexical access in language production.Cognition. 1992 Mar;42(1-3):287-314. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90046-k. Cognition. 1992. PMID: 1582160 Review.
-
Treatment for Lexical Retrieval Impairments in Primary Progressive Aphasia: A Research Update with Implications for Clinical Practice.Semin Speech Lang. 2018 Jul;39(3):242-256. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1660783. Epub 2018 Jun 22. Semin Speech Lang. 2018. PMID: 29933491 Review.
Cited by
-
How can transforming representation of mathematical entities help us employ more cognitive resources?Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 2;14:1091678. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1091678. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 36935991 Free PMC article.
-
Do French-English bilingual children gesture more than monolingual children?J Psycholinguist Res. 2009 Dec;38(6):573-85. doi: 10.1007/s10936-009-9121-7. Epub 2009 Jun 12. J Psycholinguist Res. 2009. PMID: 19521776
-
Gesture for Linguists: A Handy Primer.Lang Linguist Compass. 2015 Nov 1;9(11):437-451. doi: 10.1111/lnc3.12168. Lang Linguist Compass. 2015. PMID: 26807141 Free PMC article.
-
Gesture Helps, Only If You Need It: Inhibiting Gesture Reduces Tip-of-the-Tongue Resolution for Those With Weak Short-Term Memory.Cogn Sci. 2021 Jan;45(1):e12914. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12914. Cogn Sci. 2021. PMID: 33389787 Free PMC article.
-
Gesturing gives children new ideas about math.Psychol Sci. 2009 Mar;20(3):267-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02297.x. Epub 2009 Feb 13. Psychol Sci. 2009. PMID: 19222810 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Miscellaneous