Femoral head size is a risk factor for total hip luxation: a study of 42,987 primary hip arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register
- PMID: 14620970
- DOI: 10.1080/00016470310017893
Femoral head size is a risk factor for total hip luxation: a study of 42,987 primary hip arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register
Abstract
On the basis of the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, which has recorded nearly all primary hip prostheses and revisions in Norway since 1987, we studied risk factors for prosthesis luxation leading to revision. 7 prosthesis brand combinations used in 42,987 primary operations were included from 1987-2000. We found that femoral head size was an important risk factor; 28 mm heads led to revision more often than 32 mm ones (failure rate ratio (FRR) 4.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2-7.3). Charnley (22 mm head) performed equally well or better than the 28 mm heads. The Exeter stem and cup is the type of prosthesis on the Norwegian market with more than two femoral head sizes (26, 28, 30, 32 mm) and 26 mm heads led to revision due to luxation significantly more often than 30 mm heads (FRR 4.1, 95%CI 2.2-8.1). Old age, preoperative diagnosis, and choice of prosthesis brand combination were also important factors affecting the revision rate due to luxation. A posterior approach increased the risk of revision more than a lateral one (FRR 1.9, 95% CI 1.4-2.5). Gender, trochanteric osteotomy and duration of the operation did not affect the results.
Similar articles
-
Prosthesis survival after total hip arthroplasty--does surgical approach matter? Analysis of 19,304 Charnley and 6,002 Exeter primary total hip arthroplasties reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.Acta Orthop. 2007 Dec;78(6):719-29. doi: 10.1080/17453670710014482. Acta Orthop. 2007. PMID: 18236177
-
Conversion from failed hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty: a Norwegian Arthroplasty Register analysis of 595 hips with previous femoral neck fractures.Acta Orthop. 2007 Dec;78(6):711-8. doi: 10.1080/17453670710014473. Acta Orthop. 2007. PMID: 18236176
-
[Should monobloc cemented stems be systematically revised during revision total hip arthroplasty? A prospective evaluation].Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2008 Nov;94(7):670-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rco.2008.05.004. Epub 2008 Jul 26. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2008. PMID: 18984124 French.
-
Use of modular large femoral heads without liners in hip arthroplasty.Surg Technol Int. 2006;15:217-20. Surg Technol Int. 2006. PMID: 17029179 Review.
-
New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters.Acta Orthop Suppl. 2005 Feb;76(315):3-82. Acta Orthop Suppl. 2005. PMID: 15790289 Review.
Cited by
-
More than 50% reduction of wear in polyethylene liners with alumina heads compared to cobalt-chrome heads in hip replacements: a 10-year follow-up with radiostereometry in 43 hips.Acta Orthop. 2013 Aug;84(4):360-4. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2013.810516. Epub 2013 Jun 25. Acta Orthop. 2013. PMID: 23795579 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Modified minimally invasive two-incision total hip arthroplasty using large diameter femoral head.Indian J Orthop. 2012 Jan;46(1):29-35. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.91632. Indian J Orthop. 2012. PMID: 22345804 Free PMC article.
-
Dutch guideline on total hip prosthesis.Acta Orthop. 2011 Oct;82(5):567-76. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2011.623575. Acta Orthop. 2011. PMID: 21992086 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Improved results of primary total hip replacement.Acta Orthop. 2010 Dec;81(6):649-59. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2010.537807. Acta Orthop. 2010. PMID: 21110699 Free PMC article.
-
Alumina-on-alumina total hip replacement for femoral neck fracture in healthy patients.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Feb 1;12:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-32. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011. PMID: 21284879 Free PMC article.