Life-sustaining treatment decisions in Portuguese intensive care units: a national survey of intensive care physicians
- PMID: 14624692
- PMCID: PMC374362
- DOI: 10.1186/cc2384
Life-sustaining treatment decisions in Portuguese intensive care units: a national survey of intensive care physicians
Abstract
Introduction: The objective of the present study was to evaluate the opinion of Portuguese intensive care physicians regarding 'do-not-resuscitate' (DNR) orders and decisions to withhold/withdraw treatment.
Methods: A questionnaire was sent to all physicians working on a full-time basis in all intensive care units (ICUs) registered with the Portuguese Intensive Care Society.
Results: A total of 266 questionnaires were sent and 175 (66%) were returned. Physicians from 79% of the ICUs participated. All participants stated that DNR orders are applied in their units, and 98.3% stated that decisions to withhold treatment and 95.4% stated that decisions to withdraw treatment are also applied. About three quarters indicated that only the medical group makes these decisions. Fewer than 15% of the responders stated that they involve nurses, 9% involve patients and fewer than 11% involve patients' relatives in end-of-life decisions. Physicians with more than 10 years of clinical experience more frequently indicated that they involve nurses in these decisions (P < 0.05), and agnostic/atheist doctors more frequently involve patients' relatives in decisions to withhold/withdraw treatment (P < 0.05). When asked about who they thought should be involved, more than 26% indicated nurses, more than 35% indicated the patient and more than 25% indicated patients' relatives. More experienced doctors more frequently felt that nurses should be involved (P < 0.05), and male doctors more frequently stated that patients' relatives should be involved in DNR orders (P < 0.05). When a decision to withdraw treatment is made, 76.8% of 151 respondents indicated that they would initiate palliative care; no respondent indicated that they would administer drugs to accelerate the expected outcome.
Conclusion: The probability of survival from the acute episode and patients' wishes were the most important criteria influencing end-of-life decisions. These decisions are made only by the medical group in most of the responding ICUs, with little input from nursing staff, patients, or patients' relatives, although many respondents expressed a wish to involve them more in this process. Sex, experience and religious beliefs of the respondents influences the way in which these decisions are made.
Similar articles
-
Forgoing life-sustaining treatments: comparison of attitudes between Israeli and North American intensive care healthcare professionals.Isr Med Assoc J. 2003 Nov;5(11):770-4. Isr Med Assoc J. 2003. PMID: 14650099
-
[On the topic of do not resuscitate (DNR) orders on intensive care units: an evaluation of the present status on intensive care units of the Innsbruck University clinics].Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1999 Feb 26;111(4):161-8. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1999. PMID: 10192150 German.
-
Attitudes of physicians, nurses and relatives towards end-of-life decisions concerning nursing home patients with dementia.Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Jun;61(3):372-80. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.04.016. Epub 2005 Jun 21. Patient Educ Couns. 2006. PMID: 15975757
-
Attitudes of nursing staff towards involvement in medical end-of-life decisions: a national survey study.Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Jan;94(1):4-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.09.018. Epub 2013 Oct 5. Patient Educ Couns. 2014. PMID: 24268920 Review.
-
[Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and do not resuscitate orders].Rev Med Chil. 2007 May;135(5):669-79. Epub 2007 Jul 9. Rev Med Chil. 2007. PMID: 17657338 Review. Spanish.
Cited by
-
The Complex Dynamics of Decision-Making at the End of Life in the Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review of Stakeholders' Views and Influential Factors.Cureus. 2024 Jan 25;16(1):e52912. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52912. eCollection 2024 Jan. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38406151 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Experiences of Slovene ICU physicians with end-of-life decision making: a nation-wide survey.Med Sci Monit. 2014 Oct 21;20:2007-12. doi: 10.12659/MSM.891029. Med Sci Monit. 2014. PMID: 25335864 Free PMC article.
-
Perspectives of Iranian medical students about do-not-resuscitate orders.Maedica (Bucur). 2013 Sep;8(3):261-4. Maedica (Bucur). 2013. PMID: 24371495 Free PMC article.
-
The Iranian physicians attitude toward the do not resuscitate order.J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016 Jun 29;9:279-84. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S105002. eCollection 2016. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016. PMID: 27418832 Free PMC article.
-
The involvement of intensive care nurses in end-of-life decisions: a nationwide survey.Intensive Care Med. 2005 May;31(5):668-73. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2613-5. Epub 2005 Apr 1. Intensive Care Med. 2005. PMID: 15803296
References
-
- American Thoracic Society Bioethics Task Force Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991;144:726–731. - PubMed
-
- The Society of Critical Care Medicine Ethics Committee Attitudes of critical care medicine professionals concerning life-sustaining treatments. Crit Care Med. 1992;20:320–326. - PubMed
-
- Vincent JL. Cultural differences in end-of-life care. Crit Care Med. 2001;29(suppl):N52–N55. - PubMed
-
- Osborne ML. Physicians decisions regarding life support in the intensive care unit. Chest. 1992;101:217–224. - PubMed
-
- American College of Physicians American College of Physicians Ethics Manual. Part 2: the physician and society; research; life-sustaining treatment; other issues. Ann Intern Med. 1989;111:327–335. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources