Randomized, controlled, cross-over clinical trial comparing intravenous midazolam sedation with nitrous oxide sedation in children undergoing dental extractions
- PMID: 14633757
- DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeg278
Randomized, controlled, cross-over clinical trial comparing intravenous midazolam sedation with nitrous oxide sedation in children undergoing dental extractions
Abstract
Background: The use of benzodiazepines for paediatric dental sedation has received limited attention with regard to research into clinical effectiveness. A study was therefore designed to investigate the use of midazolam, for i.v. sedation in paediatric dental patients.
Method: The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness of i.v. midazolam in a randomized, controlled, cross-over trial. Children aged 12-16 yr (ASA I and II), requiring two appointments for equivalent but contralateral dental extractions for orthodontic purposes, were recruited. Conscious sedation with either i.v. midazolam titrated at 0.5 mg x min(-1), to a maximum of 5 mg, or nitrous oxide/oxygen titrated to 30%/70% inhalation sedation was used at the first visit, the alternative being used at the second visit. Vital signs including blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation and ventilatory frequency, as well as sedation levels and behavioural scores, were recorded every 2 min.
Results: Forty patients, mean age 13.2 yr (range 12-16 yr), participated in the trial. A mean dose of midazolam 2.8 mg was administered in the test group. The median time to the maximum level of sedation was 8 min for midazolam compared with 6 min for nitrous oxide (P<0.001). Vital signs for both treatments were comparable and within acceptable clinical limits and communication with the patient was maintained at all times. The median (range) lowest arterial oxygen saturation level recorded for midazolam was 97 (91-99)% compared with 97 (92-100)% for nitrous oxide. The mean (range) recovery time for midazolam was 51.6 (39-65) min and 23.3 (20-34) min for nitrous oxide (P<0.0001). Fifty-one per cent said they preferred i.v. midazolam, 38% preferred nitrous oxide, and 11% had no preference.
Conclusion: I.V. midazolam sedation (0.5 mg x min(-1) to a maximum of 5 mg) appears to be as effective as nitrous oxide sedation in 12-16-yr-old healthy paediatric dental patients.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of transmucosal midazolam with inhalation sedation for dental extractions in children. A randomized, cross-over, clinical trial.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007 Sep;51(8):1062-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01391.x. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007. PMID: 17697301 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomised, controlled, crossover trial of oral midazolam and nitrous oxide for paediatric dental sedation.Anaesthesia. 2002 Sep;57(9):860-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2002.02784.x. Anaesthesia. 2002. PMID: 12190750 Clinical Trial.
-
A study of the effectiveness of oral midazolam sedation for orthodontic extraction of permanent teeth in children: a prospective, randomised, controlled, crossover trial.Br Dent J. 2002 Apr 27;192(8):457-62. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4801400. Br Dent J. 2002. PMID: 12014695 Clinical Trial.
-
Paediatric dentistry in the new millennium: 3. Use of inhalation sedation in paediatric dentistry.Dent Update. 2003 Sep;30(7):350-6, 358. doi: 10.12968/denu.2003.30.7.350. Dent Update. 2003. PMID: 14558199 Review.
-
Conscious sedation in paediatric dentistry: current philosophies and techniques.Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg. 2000 Oct;15:206-10. Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg. 2000. PMID: 11709940 Review.
Cited by
-
Efficacy and Safety of Nitrous Oxide (N2O) Inhalation Sedation Compared to Other Sedative Agents in Dental Procedures: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 May 20;61(5):929. doi: 10.3390/medicina61050929. Medicina (Kaunas). 2025. PMID: 40428887 Free PMC article.
-
Psychodiagnostics as a Mandatory Element of Patient Protocols in Dentistry.J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2021 Jul 30;11(4):389-396. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_60_21. eCollection 2021 Jul-Aug. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2021. PMID: 34430499 Free PMC article.
-
Intranasal Midazolam Premedication for Anxiolysis in Children Reluctant to Receive Nitrous Oxide Sedation via Nasal Hood: An In Vivo Randomized Control Trial.Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14(Suppl 2):S138-S142. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2092. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021. PMID: 35645485 Free PMC article.
-
Can intravenous conscious sedation with midazolam be effective at facilitating surgical dentistry in adolescent orthodontic patients? A service evaluation.Br Dent J. 2017 Jan 27;222(2):113-119. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.78. Br Dent J. 2017. PMID: 28127013 Free PMC article.
-
To Compare the Efficacy of Two Intravenous Combinations of Drugs Ketamine-Propofol vs Ketamine-Dexmedetomidine for Sedation in Children Undergoing Dental Treatment.Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020 Sep-Oct;13(5):529-535. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1826. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020. PMID: 33623343 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous