Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Mar-Apr;11(2):95-9.
doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1427. Epub 2003 Nov 21.

Computerized physician order entry in U.S. hospitals: results of a 2002 survey

Affiliations

Computerized physician order entry in U.S. hospitals: results of a 2002 survey

Joan S Ash et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the availability of inpatient computerized physician order entry in U.S. hospitals and the degree to which physicians are using it.

Design: Combined mail and telephone survey of 964 randomly selected hospitals, contrasting 2002 data and results of a survey conducted in 1997.

Availability: computerized order entry has been installed and is available for use by physicians; inducement: the degree to which use of computers to enter orders is required of physicians; participation: the proportion of physicians at an institution who enter orders by computer; and saturation: the proportion of total orders at an institution entered by a physician using a computer.

Results: The response rate was 65%. Computerized order entry was not available to physicians at 524 (83.7%) of 626 hospitals responding, whereas 60 (9.6%) reported complete availability and 41 (6.5%) reported partial availability. Of 91 hospitals providing data about inducement/requirement to use the system, it was optional at 31 (34.1%), encouraged at 18 (19.8%), and required at 42 (46.2%). At 36 hospitals (45.6%), more than 90% of physicians on staff use the system, whereas six (7.6%) reported 51-90% participation and 37 (46.8%) reported participation by fewer than half of physicians. Saturation was bimodal, with 25 (35%) hospitals reporting that more than 90% of all orders are entered by physicians using a computer and 20 (28.2%) reporting that less than 10% of all orders are entered this way.

Conclusion: Despite increasing consensus about the desirability of computerized physician order entry (CPOE) use, these data indicate that only 9.6% of U.S. hospitals presently have CPOE completely available. In those hospitals that have CPOE, its use is frequently required. In approximately half of those hospitals, more than 90% of physicians use CPOE; in one-third of them, more than 90% of orders are entered via CPOE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The postcard survey about computerized physician order entry used in both 1997 and 2002.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Extent of physician use of computerized physician order entry (CPOE) in 2002. Participation = proportion of physician staff that use CPOE; saturation = proportion of total orders entered by CPOE.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Electronic medical records: ask physicians what they want [editorial]. Am Med News. 7April2003;46:23.
    1. Ash JS, Gorman PN, Hersh WR. Physician order entry in US hospitals. Proc AMIA Symp. 1998:235–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sittig D, Stead W. Snap-shot of CHIME: physician order entry. Healthc Inform. 1994;11:38. - PubMed
    1. Ringold Schneider PJ. ASHP national survey of pharmacy practice in acute care settings: dispensing and administration—1999. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2000;57:1759–75. - PubMed
    1. Haruki Y, Ogushi Y, Okada Y, Kimura M, Kumamoto I, Sekita Y. Status and perspective of hospital information systems in Japan. Methods Inf Med. 1999;38:200–6. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms