Screening performance of first-trimester nuchal translucency for major cardiac defects: a meta-analysis
- PMID: 14634564
- DOI: 10.1067/s0002-9378(03)00645-8
Screening performance of first-trimester nuchal translucency for major cardiac defects: a meta-analysis
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the screening performance of increased first-trimester nuchal translucency for the detection of major congenital heart defects.
Study design: A meta-analysis based on MEDLINE and EMBASE searches (up to June 2002) that assessed the diagnostic performance of increased nuchal translucency for congenital heart defect detection. Weighted sensitivity and specificity estimates (random effects) and summary receiver-operating characteristic curves were obtained.
Results: Eight independent studies with 58,492 pregnant women were analyzed. There was significant heterogeneity among the studies. Nuchal translucency above the 99th percentile had a sensitivity of 31% and specificity of 98.7% (random effects calculations), with a positive likelihood ratio of 24. Summary receiver-operating characteristic estimates were consistent with these values. The ability of nuchal translucency measurements above this threshold to detect cardiac malformations varied nonsignificantly (P=.64) for different congenital heart defects types (sensitivity range, 25%-55%).
Conclusion: Nuchal translucency screening is a modestly efficient strategy for congenital heart defect detection; the use of the 99th percentile threshold may capture approximately 30% of congenital heart defects.
Similar articles
-
Nuchal translucency measurement and congenital heart defects: modest association in low-risk pregnancies.Prenat Diagn. 2007 Feb;27(2):164-9. doi: 10.1002/pd.1643. Prenat Diagn. 2007. PMID: 17238215
-
Nuchal translucency and fetal cardiac defects: a pooled analysis of major fetal echocardiography centers.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jan;192(1):89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.081. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005. PMID: 15672008
-
Nuchal translucency and congenital heart defects: heart failure or not?Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Jul;16(1):30-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00158.x. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000. PMID: 11084962
-
First-trimester ductus venosus screening for cardiac defects: a meta-analysis.BJOG. 2011 Nov;118(12):1438-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03029.x. Epub 2011 Jun 14. BJOG. 2011. PMID: 21668765 Review.
-
Outcome of fetuses with increased nuchal translucency.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Apr;13(2):169-74. doi: 10.1097/00001703-200104000-00012. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2001. PMID: 11315872 Review.
Cited by
-
Cost-effectiveness of prenatal screening strategies for congenital heart disease.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jul;44(1):50-7. doi: 10.1002/uog.13287. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 24357432 Free PMC article.
-
Nuchal Translucency and Congenital Heart Defects.Curr Cardiol Rev. 2024;20(2):1-13. doi: 10.2174/011573403X264963231128045500. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2024. PMID: 38275068 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical utility of fetal echocardiography: an Egyptian center experience.Egypt Heart J. 2021 Aug 19;73(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s43044-021-00196-z. Egypt Heart J. 2021. PMID: 34410524 Free PMC article.
-
Proteome profiling of early gestational plasma reveals novel biomarkers of congenital heart disease.EMBO Mol Med. 2023 Dec 7;15(12):e17745. doi: 10.15252/emmm.202317745. Epub 2023 Oct 16. EMBO Mol Med. 2023. PMID: 37840432 Free PMC article.
-
Learning Curve of First-Trimester Detailed Cardiovascular Ultrasound Screening by Moderately Experienced Obstetricians in 3509 Consecutive Unselected Pregnancies with Fetal Follow-Up.Life (Basel). 2024 Dec 9;14(12):1632. doi: 10.3390/life14121632. Life (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39768340 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical