Examining the time course of facilitation and inhibition with simultaneous onset and offset cues
- PMID: 14634813
- DOI: 10.1007/s00426-003-0130-0
Examining the time course of facilitation and inhibition with simultaneous onset and offset cues
Abstract
The experiment conducted examined the effect of simultaneously presented onset and offset cues on the orienting of attention in the visual field. Subjects were presented with a display that consisted of four placeholder boxes around a central fixation point. An onset and an offset cue appeared simultaneously in two of the locations, and the other two locations provided a neutral baseline condition. Reaction times were measured in a simple target detection task with stimulus-onset asynchronies (SOAs) that ranged from 100 ms to 1,000 ms. As expected, the onset cue produced early facilitation and later occurring inhibition of return (IOR). The offset cue produced significant inhibition at all but the earliest SOA. These results suggest that simultaneously presented onset and offset cues both capture attention, but that attention is rapidly disengaged from the location of the offset cue, resulting in earlier occurring IOR. For the onset cues, attention is allocated for a longer period of time, producing the typical pattern of early facilitation and later occurring IOR. The differing time course of attention at each location may reflect separate facilitatory and inhibitory processes, and the priority given to the onset of a stimulus by the attentional system.
Similar articles
-
On the uniqueness of attentional capture by uninformative gaze cues: facilitation interacts with the Simon effect and is rarely followed by IOR.Can J Exp Psychol. 2007 Dec;61(4):293-303. doi: 10.1037/cjep2007029. Can J Exp Psychol. 2007. PMID: 18266505
-
The effects of onsets and offsets on visual attention.Psychol Res. 2001;65(3):185-91. doi: 10.1007/s004260100058. Psychol Res. 2001. PMID: 11571913
-
Inhibition of return with rapid serial shifts of attention: implications for memory and visual search.Percept Psychophys. 2003 Oct;65(7):1126-35. doi: 10.3758/bf03194839. Percept Psychophys. 2003. PMID: 14674638
-
Attentional capture by auto- and allo-cues.Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Dec;10(4):814-42. doi: 10.3758/bf03196545. Psychon Bull Rev. 2003. PMID: 15000532 Review.
-
On the measurement of the effects of alcohol and illicit substances on inhibition of return.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012 Jun;221(4):541-50. doi: 10.1007/s00213-012-2725-x. Epub 2012 May 9. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012. PMID: 22569816 Review.
Cited by
-
Preceding stimulus awareness augments offset-evoked potentials: evidence from motion-induced blindness.Psychol Res. 2007 Nov;71(6):694-702. doi: 10.1007/s00426-006-0058-2. Epub 2006 Apr 26. Psychol Res. 2007. PMID: 16639612
-
The control of visual attention and its influence on prioritized processing in a location negative priming paradigm.Psychol Res. 2006 Jul;70(4):317-35. doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0220-2. Epub 2005 Sep 7. Psychol Res. 2006. PMID: 16151719
-
Object appearance, disappearance, and attention prioritization in real-world scenes.Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Dec;12(6):1061-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03206444. Psychon Bull Rev. 2005. PMID: 16615329
-
The Time Course of Inhibition of Return: Evidence from Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials.Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 12;8:1562. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01562. eCollection 2017. Front Psychol. 2017. PMID: 28955277 Free PMC article.
-
Spatial Stroop and spatial orienting: the role of onset versus offset cues.Psychol Res. 2010 May;74(3):277-90. doi: 10.1007/s00426-009-0253-z. Epub 2009 Aug 20. Psychol Res. 2010. PMID: 19693533
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials