Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 May;8(2):108-12.
doi: 10.1007/s10029-003-0181-6. Epub 2003 Nov 21.

Effect of prosthetic material on adhesion formation after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in a porcine model

Affiliations

Effect of prosthetic material on adhesion formation after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in a porcine model

E C Borrazzo et al. Hernia. 2004 May.

Abstract

Intraperitoneal placement of prosthetic mesh causes adhesion formation after laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. A prosthesis that prevents or reduces adhesion formation is desirable. In this study, 21 pigs were randomized to receive laparoscopic placement of plain polypropylene mesh (PPM), expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE), or polypropylene coated on one side with a bioresorbable adhesion barrier (PPM/HA/CMC). The animals were sacrificed after 28 days and evaluated for adhesion formation. Mean area of adhesion formation was 14% (SD+/-15) in the PPM/HA/CMC group, 40% (SD+/-17) in the PPM group, and 41% (SD+/-39) in the ePTFE group. The difference between PPM/HA/CMC and PPM was significant ( P=0.013). A new visceral layer of mesothelium was present in seven out of seven PPM/HA/CMC cases, six out of seven PPM cases, and two out of seven ePTFE cases. Thus, laparoscopic placement of PPM/HA/CMC reduces adhesion formation compared to other mesh types used for laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eur J Surg. 1997 Apr;163(4):261-6 - PubMed
    1. Am Surg. 1996 May;62(5):331-5 - PubMed
    1. Am Surg. 1999 Sep;65(9):827-31; discussion 831-2 - PubMed
    1. Br J Surg. 1998 Oct;85(10):1415-8 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 1997 Jul;11(7):772-3 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources