Time-to-contact estimation of accelerated stimuli is based on first-order information
- PMID: 14640832
- DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.6.1083
Time-to-contact estimation of accelerated stimuli is based on first-order information
Abstract
The goal of this study was to test whether 1st-order information, which does not account for acceleration, is used (a) to estimate the time to contact (TTC) of an accelerated stimulus after the occlusion of a final part of its trajectory and (b) to indirectly intercept an accelerated stimulus with a thrown projectile. Both tasks require the production of an action on the basis of predictive information acquired before the arrival of the stimulus at the target and allow the experimenter to make quantitative predictions about the participants' use (or nonuse) of 1st-order information. The results show that participants do not use information about acceleration and that they commit errors that rely quantitatively on 1st-order information even when acceleration is psychophysically detectable. In the indirect interceptive task, action is planned about 200 ms before the initiation of the movement, at which time the 1st-order TTC attains a critical value.
((c) 2003 APA, all rights reserved)
Similar articles
-
Estimating the time-to-passage of visual self-motion: Is the second order motion information processed?Vision Res. 2010 Apr 21;50(9):914-23. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.02.011. Epub 2010 Feb 19. Vision Res. 2010. PMID: 20171978
-
Internal models of target motion: expected dynamics overrides measured kinematics in timing manual interceptions.J Neurophysiol. 2004 Apr;91(4):1620-34. doi: 10.1152/jn.00862.2003. Epub 2003 Nov 19. J Neurophysiol. 2004. PMID: 14627663
-
Task dependent processing of visual information about target acceleration.Brain Cogn. 2000 Jun-Aug;43(1-3):172-7. Brain Cogn. 2000. PMID: 10857688
-
Anticipating the effects of gravity when intercepting moving objects: differentiating up and down based on nonvisual cues.J Neurophysiol. 2005 Dec;94(6):4471-80. doi: 10.1152/jn.00527.2005. Epub 2005 Aug 24. J Neurophysiol. 2005. PMID: 16120661
-
Self-motion perception during conflicting visual-vestibular acceleration.J Vestib Res. 2008;18(5-6):267-72. J Vestib Res. 2008. PMID: 19542600
Cited by
-
Camera-Monitor Systems as An Opportunity to Compensate for Perceptual Errors in Time-to-Contact Estimations.Vision (Basel). 2023 Oct 8;7(4):65. doi: 10.3390/vision7040065. Vision (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37873893 Free PMC article.
-
Contributions of the human temporoparietal junction and MT/V5+ to the timing of interception revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation.J Neurosci. 2008 Nov 12;28(46):12071-84. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2869-08.2008. J Neurosci. 2008. PMID: 19005072 Free PMC article.
-
A binary acceleration signal reduces overestimation in pedestrians' visual time-to-collision estimation for accelerating vehicles.Heliyon. 2024 Mar 6;10(6):e27483. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27483. eCollection 2024 Mar 30. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 38496889 Free PMC article.
-
Gravity as a Strong Prior: Implications for Perception and Action.Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Apr 28;11:203. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00203. eCollection 2017. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017. PMID: 28503140 Free PMC article.
-
Trial-by-trial feedback fails to improve the consideration of acceleration in visual time-to-collision estimation.PLoS One. 2023 Aug 2;18(8):e0288206. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288206. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37531322 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources