Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1992;70(5):597-604.

A large waterborne viral hepatitis E epidemic in Kanpur, India

Affiliations

A large waterborne viral hepatitis E epidemic in Kanpur, India

S R Naik et al. Bull World Health Organ. 1992.

Abstract

In 1991 the largest epidemic of viral hepatitis E yet reported occurred in Kanpur (population, 2.1 million), India. The incidence of icteric hepatitis from December 1990 to April 1991 among the inhabitants of 420 randomly sampled houses in seven of the city's 50 wards was 3.76% (138 out of 3666 individuals), i.e., an estimated 79,091 persons in the city as a whole were affected. The attack rate was higher for males than females (5.3% versus 3.3%; P = 0.013) and for adults than children aged < 10 years (4.26% versus 1.29%; P = 0.0006). The incidence of hepatitis was higher in those city wards that were supplied with drinking-water consisting of a mixture of river Ganges and tubewell water than in those wards supplied only with tubewell water (5.6% versus 1.2%; P = 10(-6)). In the mixed-water areas, the incidence decreased as the drinking-water source changed from only tap to both tap and handpump, to only handpump (7.8%, 6.8%, and 4.3% respectively; P = 0.023). None of the sera collected from 41 hepatitis patients during the epidemic showed evidence of hepatitis virus A or B. There were two peaks in the epidemic (in February and April 1991). The first peak was probably caused by faecal contamination of river water, indicated by water analysis data, and the second, by inadequate chlorination of water in a reservoir. There was no evidence of secondary intrafamilial spread.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bull World Health Organ. 1991;69(1):113-9 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1991 Sep 28;338(8770):783-4 - PubMed
    1. Am J Med. 1980 Jun;68(6):818-24 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1990 Mar 16;247(4948):1335-9 - PubMed
    1. Indian J Gastroenterol. 1991 Jul;10(3):96-100 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources