Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Nov;28(6):898-903.
doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(03)00424-6.

Impact of impaired wrist motion on hand and upper-extremity performance(1)

Affiliations

Impact of impaired wrist motion on hand and upper-extremity performance(1)

Brian D Adams et al. J Hand Surg Am. 2003 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: To quantify and compare the disabilities caused by reduced and absent wrist motion using objective measurements of task performance and perceived disability, and to assess the compensatory motions of the shoulder, elbow, forearm, and trunk caused by impaired wrist motion.

Methods: A clinical study of 21 normal subjects was done to measure physical performance and to assess wrist function under conditions of reduced (30 degrees flexion and 30 degrees extension) and nearly absent wrist motion using established physical tests and questionnaires (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand [DASH], Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation [PRWE], and a study-specific survey). The clinical study also measured compensatory motions of the shoulder, elbow, forearm, and trunk.

Results: Average times to perform the Jebsen test and activities of daily living (ADLs) test increased for both motion-restricted conditions of the wrist but did not differ significantly between the conditions. Questionnaire scores regarding function were significantly worse for both motion-restricted conditions and poorest for nearly absent motion. Average compensatory motions in the extremity and trunk statistically increased for both motion-restricted conditions but were not marked and did not differ between the conditions. High variability among subjects occurred in all physical tests and questionnaires for both motion-restricted conditions.

Conclusions: Perceived disability from reduced wrist motion appeared greater than measured functional loss using common physical tests and outcome surveys.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources