Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2003 Dec 1;54(11):1154-61.
doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(03)00235-x.

Levels-of-processing effect on word recognition in schizophrenia

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Levels-of-processing effect on word recognition in schizophrenia

J Daniel Ragland et al. Biol Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: Individuals with schizophrenia have difficulty organizing words semantically to facilitate encoding. This is commonly attributed to organizational rather than semantic processing limitations. By requiring participants to classify and encode words on either a shallow (e.g., uppercase/lowercase) or deep level (e.g., concrete/abstract), the levels-of-processing paradigm eliminates the need to generate organizational strategies.

Methods: This paradigm was administered to 30 patients with schizophrenia and 30 healthy comparison subjects to test whether providing a strategy would improve patient performance.

Results: Word classification during shallow and deep encoding was slower and less accurate in patients. Patients also responded slowly during recognition testing and maintained a more conservative response bias following deep encoding; however, both groups showed a robust levels-of-processing effect on recognition accuracy, with unimpaired patient performance following both shallow and deep encoding.

Conclusions: This normal levels-of-processing effect in the patient sample suggests that semantic processing is sufficiently intact for patients to benefit from organizational cues. Memory remediation efforts may therefore be most successful if they focus on teaching patients to form organizational strategies during initial encoding.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean (±SEM) recognition discriminability for 30 healthy comparison subjects (solid line) and 30 patients with schizophrenia (dotted line).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean (±SEM) recognition response bias for 30 healthy comparison subjects (solid line) and 30 patients with schizophrenia (dotted line).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean (±SEM) reaction time (in milliseconds) for 30 healthy comparison subjects (solid line) and 30 patients with schizophrenia (dotted line).

References

    1. Aleman A, Hijman R, de Haan EHF, Kahn RS. Memory impairment in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156:1358–1366. - PubMed
    1. Allen HA, Frith CD. Selective retrieval and free emission of category exemplars in schizophrenia. Br J Psychology. 1983;74:481–490. - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press; 1994.
    1. Andreasen NC. The Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Iowa City, Iowa: The University of Iowa; 1984a. - PubMed
    1. Andreasen NC. The Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS) Iowa City, Iowa: The University of Iowa; 1984b.

Publication types