Randomised controlled trial of treatment of unilateral visual impairment detected at preschool vision screening
- PMID: 14644966
- PMCID: PMC286242
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.327.7426.1251
Randomised controlled trial of treatment of unilateral visual impairment detected at preschool vision screening
Abstract
Objectives: To test the efficacy of treatment for unilateral visual loss detected by preschool vision screening and the extent to which effectiveness varies with initial severity.
Design: Randomised controlled trial of full treatment with glasses and patching, if required, compared with glasses only or no treatment. Masked assessment of best corrected acuity after one year of follow up.
Setting: Eight UK eye departments.
Participants: 177 children aged 3-5 years with mild to moderate unilateral impairment of acuity (6/9 to 6/36) detected by screening.
Results: Children in the full and glasses treatment groups had incrementally better visual acuity at follow up than children who received no treatment, but the mean treatment effect between full and no treatment was equivalent to only one line on a Snellen chart (0.11 log units; 95% confidence interval 0.050 to 0.171; P < 0.0001). The effects of treatment depended on initial acuity: full treatment showed a substantial effect in the moderate acuity group (6/36 to 6/18 at recruitment) and no significant effect in the mild acuity group (6/9 to 6/12 at recruitment) (P = 0.006 for linear regression interaction term). For 64 children with moderate acuity loss the treatment effect was 0.20 log units, equivalent to one to two lines on a Snellen chart. When all children had received treatment, six months after the end of the trial, there was no significant difference in acuity between the groups.
Conclusions: Treatment is worth while in children with the poorest acuity, but in children with mild (6/9 to 6/12) unilateral acuity loss there was little benefit. Delay in treatment until the age of 5 did not seem to influence effectiveness.
Figures
Comment in
-
Should we be screening for and treating amblyopia?BMJ. 2003 Nov 29;327(7426):1242-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7426.1242. BMJ. 2003. PMID: 14644938 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Treatment of unilateral visual impairment on preschool vision screening: study leaves questions unanswered.BMJ. 2004 Feb 7;328(7435):348; author reply 348-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7435.348-a. BMJ. 2004. PMID: 14764508 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Treatment of unilateral visual impairment on preschool vision screening: mild amblyopia should still be treated.BMJ. 2004 Feb 7;328(7435):348; author reply 348-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7435.348-b. BMJ. 2004. PMID: 14764509 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Treatment of unilateral visual impairment on preschool vision screening: preschool vision screening should continue, perhaps earlier.BMJ. 2004 Feb 7;328(7435):348; author reply 348-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7435.348. BMJ. 2004. PMID: 14764510 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Randomised controlled trial of treatment of unilateral visual impairment detected at preschool vision screening.J Pediatr. 2004 May;144(5):687. J Pediatr. 2004. PMID: 15151125 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Comparison between over-glasses patching and adhesive patching for children with moderate amblyopia: a prospective randomized clinical trial.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Feb;256(2):429-437. doi: 10.1007/s00417-017-3851-2. Epub 2017 Dec 4. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018. PMID: 29204689 Clinical Trial.
-
Atropine vs patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia: follow-up at 15 years of age of a randomized clinical trial.JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014 Jul;132(7):799-805. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.392. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014. PMID: 24789375 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Amblyopia therapy in children identified by photoscreening.Ophthalmology. 2010 Jan;117(1):159-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.06.041. Epub 2009 Nov 5. Ophthalmology. 2010. PMID: 19896190
-
Amblyopia.Lancet. 2006 Apr 22;367(9519):1343-51. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68581-4. Lancet. 2006. PMID: 16631913 Review.
-
Childhood amblyopia: current management and new trends.Br Med Bull. 2016 Sep;119(1):75-86. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldw030. Epub 2016 Aug 19. Br Med Bull. 2016. PMID: 27543498 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Refractive adaptation in amblyopia: quantification of effect and implications for practice.Br J Ophthalmol. 2004 Dec;88(12):1552-6. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.044214. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004. PMID: 15548811 Free PMC article.
-
Amblyopia.BMJ Clin Evid. 2009 Sep 16;2009:0709. BMJ Clin Evid. 2009. PMID: 21726480 Free PMC article.
-
Do infants of birth weight less than 1500 g require additional long term ophthalmic follow up?Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 Apr;90(4):451-5. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.083550. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006. PMID: 16547326 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A double dissociation of the acuity and crowding limits to letter identification, and the promise of improved visual screening.J Vis. 2014 May 5;14(5):3. doi: 10.1167/14.5.3. J Vis. 2014. PMID: 24799622 Free PMC article.
-
Electronic recording of occlusion treatment for amblyopia: potential of the new technology.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005 Jun;243(6):539-44. doi: 10.1007/s00417-004-1067-8. Epub 2004 Dec 17. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005. PMID: 15965674
References
-
- Von Noorden GK, Campos EC. Binocular vision and ocular motility. 6th ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby, 2001.
-
- Reeves B. Taxonomy and epidemiology of amblyopia. In: Moseley M, Fielder A, eds Amblyopia: a multidisciplinary approach. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann, 2002: 68-80.
-
- Moseley M. Amblyopia: treatment and evaluation. In: Moseley M, Fielder A, eds. Amblyopia: a multidisciplinary approach. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann, 2002: 81-104.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical