Coronary heart disease prevention: insights from modelling incremental cost effectiveness
- PMID: 14644970
- PMCID: PMC286247
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.327.7426.1264
Coronary heart disease prevention: insights from modelling incremental cost effectiveness
Erratum in
- BMJ. 2004 Jan 24;328(7433):209
Abstract
Objective: To determine which treatments for preventing coronary heart disease should be offered to which patients by assessing their incremental cost effectiveness.
Design: Modelling study.
Data sources: Cost estimates (for NHS) and estimates of effectiveness obtained for aspirin, antihypertensive drugs, statins and clopidogrel.
Data synthesis: Treatment effects were assumed to be independent, and cost per coronary event prevented was calculated for treatments individually and in combination across patients at a range of coronary risks.
Results: The most cost effective preventive treatments are aspirin, initial antihypertensive treatment (bendrofluazide and atenolol), and intensive antihypertensive treatment (bendrofluazide, atenolol and enalapril), whereas simvastatin and clopidogrel are the least cost effective (cost per coronary event prevented in a patient at 10% coronary risk over five years is 3500 pounds sterling for aspirin, 12 500 pounds sterling for initial antihypertensives, 18 300 pounds sterling for intensive antihypertensives, 60 000 pounds sterling for clopidogrel, and 61 400 pounds sterling for simvastatin). Aspirin in a patient at 5% five year coronary risk costs less than a fifth as much per event prevented (7900 pounds sterling) as simvastatin in a patient at 30% five year risk (40 800 pounds sterling).
Discussion: A cost effective prevention strategy would offer aspirin and initial antihypertensive treatment to all patients at greater than 7.5% five year coronary risk before offering statins or clopidogrel to patients at greater than 15% five year coronary risk. Incremental cost effectiveness analysis of treatments produces robust, practical cost effectiveness rankings that can be used to inform treatment guidelines.
Figures
Comment in
-
What do we gain from the sixth coronary heart disease drug?BMJ. 2003 Nov 29;327(7426):1237-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7426.1237. BMJ. 2003. PMID: 14644934 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Prevention of coronary heart disease: statins are even less effective than paper shows.BMJ. 2004 Feb 14;328(7436):404; author reply 405. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7436.404-a. BMJ. 2004. PMID: 14962885 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Prevention of coronary heart disease: incremental cost effectiveness raises issues.BMJ. 2004 Feb 14;328(7436):405; author reply 405. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7436.405-a. BMJ. 2004. PMID: 14962886 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Prevention of coronary heart disease: data in table 2 could be shown more explicitly for better understanding.BMJ. 2004 Feb 14;328(7436):405; author reply 405. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7436.405-b. BMJ. 2004. PMID: 14962887 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Prevention of coronary heart disease: is a cure too expensive?BMJ. 2004 Feb 14;328(7436):405; author reply 405. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7436.405. BMJ. 2004. PMID: 14962888 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Department of Health. Chapter 2: Preventing coronary heart disease in high risk patients. In: National service framework for coronary heart disease. London: DoH, 2000: 1-32.
-
- National Institute for Clinical Excellence. NICE technical guidance for manufacturers and sponsors on making a submission to a technology appraisal. London: NICE, 2001.
-
- Netten A, Curtil L. Unit costs of health and social care 2001. Canterbury: Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, 2001.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical