Coronary angioplasty versus fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction

Comment

. 2003 Nov 27;349(22):2167-9; author reply 2167-9.

doi: 10.1056/NEJM200311273492217.

Comment

Kevin S Channer. N Engl J Med. 2003.

. 2003 Nov 27;349(22):2167-9; author reply 2167-9.

doi: 10.1056/NEJM200311273492217.

No abstract available

Comment on

A comparison of coronary angioplasty with fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction.
Andersen HR, Nielsen TT, Rasmussen K, Thuesen L, Kelbaek H, Thayssen P, Abildgaard U, Pedersen F, Madsen JK, Grande P, Villadsen AB, Krusell LR, Haghfelt T, Lomholt P, Husted SE, Vigholt E, Kjaergard HK, Mortensen LS; DANAMI-2 Investigators. Andersen HR, et al. N Engl J Med. 2003 Aug 21;349(8):733-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa025142. N Engl J Med. 2003. PMID: 12930925 Clinical Trial.

Delivery of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for the management of acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: summary of the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario Consensus Report.
Labinaz M, Swabey T, Watson R, Natarajan M, Fucile W, Lubelsky B, Sawadsky B, Cohen E, Glasgow K; CCN Consensus Panel on Access to Urgent PCI for ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Labinaz M, et al. Can J Cardiol. 2006 Mar 1;22(3):243-50. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(06)70904-7. Can J Cardiol. 2006. PMID: 16520856 Free PMC article. Review.