Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Dec;12(6):405-10.
doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.6.405.

Evaluation of the culture of safety: survey of clinicians and managers in an academic medical center

Affiliations

Evaluation of the culture of safety: survey of clinicians and managers in an academic medical center

P J Pronovost et al. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Despite the emphasis on patient safety in health care, few organizations have evaluated the extent to which safety is a strategic priority or their culture supports patient safety. In response to the Institute of Medicine's report and to an organizational commitment to patient safety, we conducted a systematic assessment of safety at the Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) and, from this, developed a strategic plan to improve safety. The specific aims of this study were to evaluate the extent to which the culture supports patient safety at JHH and the extent to which safety is a strategic priority.

Methods: During July and August 2001 we implemented two surveys in disparate populations to assess patient safety. The Safety Climate Scale (SCS) was administered to a sample of physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and other ICU staff. SCS assesses perceptions of a strong and proactive organizational commitment to patient safety. The second survey instrument, called Strategies for Leadership (SLS), evaluated the extent to which safety was a strategic priority for the organization. This survey was administered to clinical and administrative leaders.

Results: We received 395 completed SCS surveys from 82% of the departments and 86% of the nursing units. Staff perceived that supervisors had a greater commitment to safety than senior leaders. Nurses had higher scores than physicians for perceptions of safety. Twenty three completed SLS surveys were received from 77% of the JHH Patient Safety Committee members and 50% of the JHH Management Committee members. Management Committee responses were more positive than Patient Safety Committee, indicating that management perceived safety efforts to be further developed. Strategic planning received the lowest scores from both committees.

Conclusions: We believe this is one of the first large scale efforts to measure institutional culture of safety and then design improvements in health care. The survey results suggest that strategic planning of patient safety needs enhancement. Several efforts to improve our culture of safety were initiated based on these results, which should lead to measurable improvements in patient safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Evaluating the culture of safety.
    Firth-Cozens J. Firth-Cozens J. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Dec;12(6):401. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.6.401. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003. PMID: 14645750 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. J Appl Psychol. 1990 Dec;75(6):682-90 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1997 Feb 1;349(9048):309-13 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):781-5 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):745-9 - PubMed
    1. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1986 Dec;57(12 Pt 1):1198-200 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms