Organizing patient safety research to identify risks and hazards
- PMID: 14645888
- PMCID: PMC1765780
- DOI: 10.1136/qhc.12.suppl_2.ii2
Organizing patient safety research to identify risks and hazards
Abstract
Patient safety has become an international priority with major research programmes being carried out in the USA, UK, and elsewhere. The challenge is how to organize research efforts that will produce the greatest yield in making health care safer for patients. Patient safety research initiatives can be considered in three different stages: (1) identification of the risks and hazards; (2) design, implementation, and evaluation of patient safety practices; and (3) maintaining vigilance to ensure that a safe environment continues and patient safety cultures remain in place. Clearly, different research methods and approaches are needed at each of the different stages of the continuum. A number of research approaches can be used at stage 1 to identify risks and hazards including the use of medical records and administrative record review, event reporting, direct observation, process mapping, focus groups, probabilistic risk assessment, and safety culture assessment. No single method can be universally applied to identify risks and hazards in patient safety. Rather, multiple approaches using combinations of these methods should be used to increase identification of risks and hazards of health care associated injury or harm to patients.
Similar articles
-
Systematic implementation of clinical risk management in a large university hospital: the impact of risk managers.Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2015 Jan;127(1-2):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s00508-014-0620-7. Epub 2014 Nov 13. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2015. PMID: 25392253
-
Sensemaking of patient safety risks and hazards.Health Serv Res. 2006 Aug;41(4 Pt 2):1555-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00565.x. Health Serv Res. 2006. PMID: 16898979 Free PMC article.
-
Incident reporting in one UK accident and emergency department.Accid Emerg Nurs. 2006 Jan;14(1):27-37. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2005.10.001. Accid Emerg Nurs. 2006. PMID: 16321534
-
Patient safety in the NICU: a comprehensive review.J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2011 Apr-Jun;25(2):123-32. doi: 10.1097/JPN.0b013e31821693b2. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2011. PMID: 21540686 Review.
-
Pediatric safety in the emergency department: identifying risks and preparing to care for child and family.J Nurs Care Qual. 2008 Jul-Sep;23(3):189-94. doi: 10.1097/01.NCQ.0000324580.82428.70. J Nurs Care Qual. 2008. PMID: 18562858 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
An observational study: associations between nurse-reported hospital characteristics and estimated 30-day survival probabilities.BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Sep;23(9):757-64. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002781. Epub 2014 Apr 12. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014. PMID: 24728887 Free PMC article.
-
A cross-sectional study to identify organisational processes associated with nurse-reported quality and patient safety.BMJ Open. 2012 Dec 20;2(6):e001967. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001967. Print 2012. BMJ Open. 2012. PMID: 23263021 Free PMC article.
-
Using standardised patients in an objective structured clinical examination as a patient safety tool.Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i46-50. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.suppl_1.i46. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004. PMID: 15465955 Free PMC article.
-
Implementation of a surgical safety checklist: interventions to optimize the process and hints to increase compliance.PLoS One. 2015 Feb 6;10(2):e0116926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116926. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 25658317 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic implementation of clinical risk management in a large university hospital: the impact of risk managers.Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2015 Jan;127(1-2):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s00508-014-0620-7. Epub 2014 Nov 13. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2015. PMID: 25392253
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources