Secondary prevention of coronary artery disease in high-risk diabetic patients

Abstract

Background and aim: To compare guideline implementation and the actual delivery of secondary prevention for coronary artery disease in the cohort of Italian diabetic patients enrolled in the DAI study.

Methods and results: The DAI study is a multicentre cohort study of the prevalence and incidence of macroangiopathic events among 19,570 type 2 diabetic patients attending 201 Diabetic Care Units. For this study, we selected 1,475 subjects with a history of myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty at enrollment. Only 25% of the coronary patients in secondary prevention were receiving lipid-lowering drugs, and 20% were receiving beta-blockers. None of the patients in 54/185 Diabetic Care Units were on statins, and none in 82/185 Units were on beta-blockers. Multivariate analysis showed a positive correlation between the number of treatments and the taking of statins, and a negative correlation with age.

Conclusion: Our data highlight a gap between the therapeutic guidelines and actual treatment, with wide variability in the delivery of secondary prevention across Units. The out-of-pocket cost of medication, daily treatment burden and geographic area can be ruled out as possible explanatory factors. Physicians' prescription attitudes may be a possible reason.