Standardization of two immunological HbA1c routine assays according to the new IFCC reference method
- PMID: 14651337
Standardization of two immunological HbA1c routine assays according to the new IFCC reference method
Abstract
The measurement of HbA1c is meanwhile well established as the most important parameter in clinical chemistry for monitoring the long term metabolic control of diabetic patients. However, the comparability of HbA1c values obtained by different methods in different laboratories and different countries is limited since there was no internationally agreed reference method available. Additionally the % HbA1c values, based on the most common DCCT values are too high due to well known non specificity of the DCCT standardization protocol. Recently a new reference method for the determination of HbA1c was developed and has been approved by the IFCC as the future basis for the worldwide standardization of HbA1c routine assays. The two routine methods from Roche Diagnostics (both based on the immunoturbidimetric determination of the stable glucose adduct to the N-terminal group of the hemoglobin beta chain, Roche-Hitachi/Tina-quant [a] and COBAS INTEGRA) are directly standardized against this new reference method. Both routine methods are based on a two step approach: in a first step the total Hb is quantified by a colorimetric method and in a second step the stable glucose adduct to the N-terminal group of the hemoglobin beta chain is quantified by immunoturbidity (HbA1c mass). Consequently, first the standardization of the total Hb assay was reconfirmed by method comparisons against the cyanomethemoglobin reference method. Second, the standardization of the HbA1c mass was done by running method comparisons against the new IFCC reference method. The resulting new calibrator values for HbA1c [mass] and total Hb [mass] allow a direct estimation of % HbA1c according to IFCC just by calculating the HbA1c [mass]/total Hb [mass] ratio. Good linear correlations were obtained when comparing the routine methods against the new IFCC reference, indicating the high specificity of these immunological approaches. The following correlations are obtained: Hitachi / Tina-quant [a] (Y) versus IFCC reference method (X): Y = -0.031 + 1.009 x X; r = 0.995. COBAS INTEGRA (Y) versus IFCC reference method (X): Y = -0.156 + 1.006 x X; r = 0.997. Hitachi / Tina-quant [a] (Y) versus Integra (X); (both standardized according to IFCC): Y = 0.057 + 1.003 x X; r = 0.997. The HbA1c values obtained with this new IFCC standardization are significantly lower than the well known DCCT values. Due to the specificity of the immunological approach which is very close to the analyte as defined by the IFCC reference method, no further corrections of the obtained % HbA1c values are necessary. A slope/intercept correction formula is derived which allows the transformation of IFCC values into the DCCT numbers if requested.
Similar articles
-
Approved IFCC reference method for the measurement of HbA1c in human blood.Clin Chem Lab Med. 2002 Jan;40(1):78-89. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2002.016. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2002. PMID: 11916276
-
Hb variants in Korea: effect on HbA1c using five routine methods.Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017 Jul 26;55(8):1234-1242. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2016-0865. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017. PMID: 28107170
-
Japanese standard reference material for JDS Lot 2 haemoglobin A1c. I: Comparison of Japan Diabetes Society-assigned values to those obtained by the Japanese and USA domestic standardization programmes and by the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry reference laboratories.Ann Clin Biochem. 2005 Jan;42(Pt 1):41-6. doi: 10.1258/0004563053026835. Ann Clin Biochem. 2005. PMID: 15802031
-
Global standardisation of HbA1c.Malays J Pathol. 2008 Dec;30(2):67-71. Malays J Pathol. 2008. PMID: 19291914 Review.
-
[Aspects of the standardization of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) measurement].Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2011 Feb;30(176):155-9. Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2011. PMID: 21544989 Review. Polish.
Cited by
-
L-Arginine-Dependent Nitric Oxide Production in the Blood of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Pilot, Five-Year Prospective Study.Life (Basel). 2024 Apr 26;14(5):556. doi: 10.3390/life14050556. Life (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38792578 Free PMC article.
-
Significance of HbA1c Test in Diagnosis and Prognosis of Diabetic Patients.Biomark Insights. 2016 Jul 3;11:95-104. doi: 10.4137/BMI.S38440. eCollection 2016. Biomark Insights. 2016. PMID: 27398023 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Role of adjunctive therapy with subantimicrobial doses of doxycycline in glycemic control (HbA1c) in patients with diabetes and endo-periodontal lesions to prevent sinus complications.Exp Ther Med. 2021 Mar;21(3):277. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.9708. Epub 2021 Jan 25. Exp Ther Med. 2021. PMID: 33603884 Free PMC article.
-
Correlation of same-visit HbA1c test with laboratory-based measurements: a MetroNet study.BMC Fam Pract. 2005 Jul 13;6:28. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-6-28. BMC Fam Pract. 2005. PMID: 16014170 Free PMC article.
-
Hemoglobin A1c values are affected by hemoglobin level and gender in non-anemic Koreans.J Diabetes Investig. 2014 Feb 12;5(1):60-5. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12123. Epub 2013 Aug 5. J Diabetes Investig. 2014. PMID: 24843738 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources
Medical