Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2003 Sep;15(6):423-7.
doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(03)00086-2.

Reduction of emetic symptoms during cesarean delivery with antiemetics: propofol at subhypnotic dose versus traditional antiemetics

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Reduction of emetic symptoms during cesarean delivery with antiemetics: propofol at subhypnotic dose versus traditional antiemetics

Mitsuko Numazaki et al. J Clin Anesth. 2003 Sep.

Retraction in

Abstract

Study objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of propofol (at a subhypnotic dose), droperidol, and metoclopramide in reducing emetic symptoms during cesarean delivery.

Design: Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study.

Setting: University hospital.

Patients: 100 ASA physical status I and II parturients undergoing cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia.

Interventions: Patients received placebo (saline) followed by placebo (Intralipid(R)), placebo (saline) followed by propofol at a subhypnotic dose (1.0 mg/kg/hr), droperidol 1.25 mg followed by placebo (Intralipid(R)), or metoclopramide 10 mg followed by placebo (Intralipid(R)) intravenously (IV) immediately after clamping of the umbilical cord.

Measurement and main results: The percentage of patients who were emesis-free, which was defined as experiencing no nausea, retching, or vomiting, in the intraoperative, postdelivery period was 80% with propofol, 80% with droperidol, and 78% with metoclopramide (p < 0.05), compared with placebo (40%). Severity of nausea was less inpatients who received propofol than in those who received placebo (p < 0.05), and there were no differences seen among the droperidol, metoclopramide, and placebo groups. No clinically serious adverse events as a result of the study drugs were observed in any of the groups.

Conclusions: Prophylactic antiemetic efficacy of propofol at a subhypnotic dose (1.0 mg/kg/hr), droperidol 1.25 mg, and metoclopramide 10 mg is comparable in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery. Moreover, propofol at a subhypnotic dose is effective in the prevention of severe nausea.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources