Preoperative estimation of the pathological breast tumour size by physical examination, mammography and ultrasound: a prospective study on 105 invasive tumours
- PMID: 14652148
- DOI: 10.1016/s0720-048x(03)00081-0
Preoperative estimation of the pathological breast tumour size by physical examination, mammography and ultrasound: a prospective study on 105 invasive tumours
Abstract
Objective: The clinical breast tumour size can be assessed preoperatively by physical examination, mammography and ultrasound. At present it is not clear which modality correlates best with the histological invasive breast tumour size. This prospective study aims to determine the most accurate clinical method (physical examination, mammography or ultrasound) to predict the histological invasive tumour size preoperatively.
Methods and patients: Between October 1999 and August 2000, 96 women with 105 invasive malignant breast tumours were included in this study. All patients underwent excision and the tumour size was measured on histology. Tumour size was measured by all three modalities in 73 cases. Results were evaluated by calculating correlation coefficients. The examination modalities presenting the best estimation of the pathological tumour size were used in a stepwise linear regression analysis to construct a formula predicting the pathological tumour size from the result of the various diagnostic modalities.
Results: The correlation coefficient between ultrasound and pathological size (r=0.68) was significantly better than the correlations between physical examination and pathological size (r=0.42) and mammographic and pathological size (r=0.44). Physical examination overestimates and ultrasound underestimates breast tumour classification. The most accurate prediction formula was: Pathological tumour size (mm) equals sonographic tumour size (mm)+3 mm.
Conclusion: When comparing physical examination, mammography and ultrasound for the prediction of the pathological size of a malignant breast tumour, ultrasound is the best predictor. The ensuing regression formula determines pathological size as tumour size by ultrasound+3 mm. However, with the wide 95% confidence interval of +/-11 mm, it remains difficult to predict the exact pathological size for an individual invasive breast tumour. A small deviation in millimetres of the tumour size could lead to a change in treatment and to another prognostic estimate.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of breast cancer size: a comparison of methods.Eur J Surg Oncol. 1992 Feb;18(1):44-8. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1992. PMID: 1737593 Clinical Trial.
-
Relative value of physical examination, mammography, and breast sonography in evaluating the size of the primary tumor and regional lymph node metastases in women receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast carcinoma.Clin Cancer Res. 1997 Sep;3(9):1565-9. Clin Cancer Res. 1997. PMID: 9815844
-
[Accuracy of preoperative establishment of invasive breast carcinoma size using ultrasound and mammography].Rozhl Chir. 2010 Oct;89(10):599-603. Rozhl Chir. 2010. PMID: 21374942 Czech.
-
How reliable is modern breast imaging in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions in the symptomatic population?Clin Radiol. 1999 Oct;54(10):676-82. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(99)91090-5. Clin Radiol. 1999. PMID: 10541394 Review.
-
Ultrasound is a useful adjunct to mammography in the assessment of breast tumours in all patients.Int J Clin Pract. 2009 Nov;63(11):1589-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02102.x. Epub 2009 Aug 14. Int J Clin Pract. 2009. PMID: 19686337 Review.
Cited by
-
Development and evaluation of a method for tumor growth simulation in virtual clinical trials of breast cancer screening.J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2022 May;9(3):033503. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.9.3.033503. Epub 2022 Jun 6. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2022. PMID: 35685119 Free PMC article.
-
Current Landscape of Breast Cancer Imaging and Potential Quantitative Imaging Markers of Response in ER-Positive Breast Cancers Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy.Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jun 9;12(6):1511. doi: 10.3390/cancers12061511. Cancers (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32527022 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Positive Predictive Values of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 Lesions and its Mammographic Morphological Features.Indian J Surg Oncol. 2021 Mar;12(1):182-189. doi: 10.1007/s13193-020-01274-5. Epub 2021 Jan 11. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33814852 Free PMC article.
-
Monitoring the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer using ultrasound scattering coefficient: A preliminary report.J Ultrason. 2019;19(77):89-97. doi: 10.15557/JoU.2019.0013. Epub 2019 Jun 28. J Ultrason. 2019. PMID: 31355579 Free PMC article.
-
In Vivo Tumor Growth Rate Measured by US in Preoperative Period and Long Term Disease Outcome in Breast Cancer Patients.PLoS One. 2015 Dec 10;10(12):e0144144. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144144. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26657267 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical