Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1992 Dec;100(6):314-8.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1992.tb01078.x.

Progression of approximal caries in primary molars and the effect of Duraphat treatment

Affiliations

Progression of approximal caries in primary molars and the effect of Duraphat treatment

M Peyron et al. Scand J Dent Res. 1992 Dec.

Abstract

The progression of caries lesions over a 2-yr period was studied in 3-6-yr-olds. All 468 children included in the study lived in an area during 1977-85 (Malmö, Sweden) with a low fluoride concentration (0.2 ppm) in the drinking water. Radiographs were taken with a standardized periodic identical technique. Caries lesions were scored on the distal surface of the first and on the mesial surface of the second primary molars (maximum 8 per child) according to Gröndahl et al. Half of the children were treated semiannually with a fluoride varnish (Duraphat). In all, 421 surfaces with caries at baseline were available at the 1-yr examination and 369 at the 2-yr examination. After 1 yr, 34.1% of the shallow enamel lesions remained unchanged, while a progression was seen in 60.9%. 5.1% had been restored. The corresponding figures after 2 yr were 20.6, 52.1 and 27.3%. Of the deeper enamel lesions at baseline, 28.8% remained unchanged after 1 yr and 13.7% after 2 yr. Of the lesions extending into the dentin, 81.5% had been restored after 1 yr and all after 2 yr. When evaluating the effect of Duraphat, only the percentage of individuals with one or more superficial enamel lesions showing progression was determined. After 1 yr, 51.2% in the Duraphat (n = 41) and 82.8% in the control group (n = 29) showed progression (restored surfaces included). The corresponding figures after 2 yr were 66.7 (n = 42) and 91.2% (n = 34). The differences after both 1 yr and 2 yr were statistically significant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources