Semen quality and intrauterine insemination
- PMID: 14656412
- DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61894-9
Semen quality and intrauterine insemination
Abstract
There is good evidence in literature that intrauterine insemination (IUI) is the best first line treatment and most cost-effective procedure for moderate male factor subfertility. It seems very difficult to identify individual semen parameters predicting the likelihood of pregnancy after IUI. This can be explained by a lack of standardization of semen analysis, but many other methodological variables may also influence IUI success rates such as the patient selection, type of ovarian stimulation and number of inseminations per cycle. A review of the literature confirmed that sperm morphology using strict criteria and the inseminating motile sperm count (IMC) after sperm preparation are the two most important sperm parameters to assess the real impact of semen quality on IUI outcome. A universal threshold level above which IUI can be performed with acceptable pregnancy rates has not been determined yet, although IUI success seems to be impaired with <5% normal spermatozoa and an IMC of <1 x 10(6). Until now, no method of sperm preparation has been shown to be superior with regard to pregnancy rate after IUI. Whether supplementation of culture media with substances such as antioxidants and platelet activating factor may improve the results remains the subject of further research.
Similar articles
-
Predictive value of sperm morphology and progressively motile sperm count for pregnancy outcomes in intrauterine insemination.Fertil Steril. 2016 Jun;105(6):1462-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 2. Fertil Steril. 2016. PMID: 26930619
-
Efficacy of the motile sperm organelle morphology examination (MSOME) in predicting pregnancy after intrauterine insemination.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2011 Aug 23;9:120. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-9-120. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2011. PMID: 21861903 Free PMC article.
-
Prediction of pregnancy by intrauterine insemination using CASA estimates and strict criteria in patients with male factor infertility.Int J Androl. 2004 Apr;27(2):63-8. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-6263.2004.00437.x. Int J Androl. 2004. PMID: 15149462
-
Intrauterine insemination for treatment of male infertility.Int J Androl. 1997;20 Suppl 3:55-64. Int J Androl. 1997. PMID: 9466187 Review.
-
The role of intrauterine insemination in male infertility.Hum Fertil (Camb). 2010 Dec;13(4):226-32. doi: 10.3109/14647273.2010.533811. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2010. PMID: 21117932 Review.
Cited by
-
Determinant Factors for Ongoing Pregnancy in Homologous Intrauterine Insemination Cycles - A Prospective Study.In Vivo. 2024 May-Jun;38(3):1384-1389. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13579. In Vivo. 2024. PMID: 38688624 Free PMC article.
-
Annexin V magnetic-activated cell sorting versus swim-up for the selection of human sperm in ART: is the new approach better then the traditional one?J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014 Aug;31(8):1045-51. doi: 10.1007/s10815-014-0267-3. Epub 2014 Jun 7. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014. PMID: 24906302 Free PMC article.
-
Approaches to improve the diagnosis and management of infertility.Hum Reprod Update. 2009 Jul-Aug;15(4):391-408. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmp012. Epub 2009 Apr 20. Hum Reprod Update. 2009. PMID: 19380415 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Severe male factor in in vitro fertilization: definition, prevalence, and treatment. An update.Asian J Androl. 2022 Mar-Apr;24(2):125-134. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_53_21. Asian J Androl. 2022. PMID: 34259196 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Simplified sperm testing devices: a possible tool to overcome lack of accessibility and inconsistency in male factor infertility diagnosis. An opportunity for low- and middle- income countries.Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2021 Mar 31;13(1):79-93. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.13.1.011. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2021. PMID: 33889864 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical