Cost effectiveness and cost utility model of public place defibrillators in improving survival after prehospital cardiopulmonary arrest
- PMID: 14656838
- PMCID: PMC286317
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.327.7427.1316
Cost effectiveness and cost utility model of public place defibrillators in improving survival after prehospital cardiopulmonary arrest
Abstract
Objective: To determine the cost effectiveness and cost utility of locating defibrillators in all major airports, railway stations, and bus stations throughout Scotland.
Design: Economic modelling exercise with data from Heartstart (Scotland). Parameters used in economic model included direct costs derived for increased accident and emergency attendances, increased hospital bed days, purchase and maintenance of defibrillators, and training in their use; life years gained calculated from increased discharges from hospital and mean survival after discharge; utility (quality of life) obtained from published data. Sensitivity analyses tested the robustness of model. Future gains discounted at 1.5% a year and future costs at 6%.
Setting: Whole of Scotland.
Subjects: Records of all prehospital cardiac arrests due to presumed heart disease that occurred in a major airport, railway, or bus station between May 1991 and March 1998 and were not witnessed by ambulance or medical staff.
Main outcome measures: Observed survival to hospital admission and observed survival to discharge. Predicted survival calculated by applying observed survival in patients attended by ambulance staff within three minutes to those who waited longer.
Results: The total discounted direct costs were 18 325 pounds sterling a year. The cost per life year gained was 29 625 pounds sterling (49 625 dollars, 43 151 Euros) and the cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained was pound 41 146 (68 924 dollars, 59 932 Euros). More widespread provision of public place defibrillators would increase these figures.
Conclusions: The cost per QALY calculated for public place defibrillators represents poorer value for money than some alternative strategies for improving survival after prehospital cardiopulmonary arrest, such as the use of other trained first responders. The figure exceeds the commonly discussed cut off levels for funding in the United Kingdom and United States of pound 30 000 and 50 000 dollars per QALY, respectively.
Similar articles
-
Health system costs of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in relation to time to shock.Circulation. 2004 Oct 5;110(14):1967-73. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000143150.13727.19. Epub 2004 Sep 20. Circulation. 2004. PMID: 15381641
-
Cost effectiveness of defibrillation by targeted responders in public settings.Circulation. 2003 Aug 12;108(6):697-703. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000084545.65645.28. Epub 2003 Aug 4. Circulation. 2003. PMID: 12900345
-
Cost-effectiveness of training unselected laypersons in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation.Am J Med. 2005 Jan;118(1):58-67. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.08.014. Am J Med. 2005. PMID: 15639211
-
Cost-effectiveness of automated external defibrillators in public places: con.Curr Opin Cardiol. 2007 Jan;22(1):5-10. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e3280118fec. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2007. PMID: 17143038 Review.
-
Cost-effectiveness of automated external defibrillators in public places: pro.Curr Opin Cardiol. 2007 Jan;22(1):1-4. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e32801173c1. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2007. PMID: 17143037 Review.
Cited by
-
Hospital costs of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients treated in intensive care; a single centre evaluation using the national tariff-based system.BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 2;5(4):e005797. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005797. BMJ Open. 2015. PMID: 25838503 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review of cost-effectiveness of treating out of hospital cardiac arrest and the implications for resource-limited health systems.Int J Emerg Med. 2024 Oct 9;17(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12245-024-00727-w. Int J Emerg Med. 2024. PMID: 39385075 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation.Arch Dis Child. 2007 Oct;92(10):916-21. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.115618. Arch Dis Child. 2007. PMID: 17895341 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Support and Assessment for Fall Emergency Referrals (SAFER 1) trial protocol. Computerised on-scene decision support for emergency ambulance staff to assess and plan care for older people who have fallen: evaluation of costs and benefits using a pragmatic cluster randomised trial.BMC Emerg Med. 2010 Jan 26;10:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-10-2. BMC Emerg Med. 2010. PMID: 20102616 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
[Public access defibrillation. Limited use by trained first responders and laymen].Anaesthesist. 2006 Dec;55(12):1281-90. doi: 10.1007/s00101-006-1098-0. Anaesthesist. 2006. PMID: 17021885 Review. German.
References
-
- Secretary of State for Health. Saving lives: our healthier nation. London: Department of Health, 1999.
-
- Nichol G, Hallstrom AP, Kerber R, Moss AJ, Ornato JP, Palmer D, et al. American Heart Association report on the second public access defibrillation conference, April 17-19, 1997. Circulation 1998;97: 1309-14. - PubMed
-
- Cummins RO, Chamberlain DA, Abramson NS, Allen M, Baskett PJ, Becker L, et al. Recommended guidelines for uniform reporting of data from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the Utstein style. A statement for health professionals from a task force of the American Heart Association, the European Resuscitation Council, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, and the Australian Resuscitation Council. Circulation 1991;84: 960-75. - PubMed
-
- Nichol G, Hallstrom A, Ornato J, Riegal B, Stiell IG, Valenzuela T, et al. Potential cost-effectiveness of public access defibrillation in the United States. Circulation 1998;97: 1315-20. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical