Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2003 Dec 6;327(7427):1329-31.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7427.1329.

Introducing criteria based audit into Ugandan maternity units

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Introducing criteria based audit into Ugandan maternity units

Andrew D Weeks et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Problem: Maternal mortality in Uganda has remained unchanged at 500/100 000 over the past 10 years despite concerted efforts to improve the standard of maternity care. It is especially difficult to improve standards in rural areas, where there is little money for improvements. Furthermore, staff may be isolated, poorly paid, disempowered, lacking in morale, and have few skills to bring about change.

Design: Training programme to introduce criteria based audit into rural Uganda.

Setting: Makerere University Medical School, Mulago Hospital (large government teaching hospital in Kampala), and Mpigi District (rural area with 10 small health centres around a district hospital).

Strategies for change: Didactic teaching about criteria based audit followed by practical work in own units, with ongoing support and follow up workshops.

Effects of change: Improvements were seen in many standards of care. Staff showed universal enthusiasm for the training; many staff produced simple, cost-free improvements in their standard of care.

Lessons learnt: Teaching of criteria based audit to those providing health care in developing countries can produce low cost improvements in the standards of care. Because the method is simple and can be used to provide improvements even without new funding, it has the potential to produce sustainable and cost effective changes in the standard of health care. Follow up is needed to prevent a waning of enthusiasm with time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Example of a “why? why?” analysis for identifying the underlying cause of nursing staff arriving late for work
Fig 2
Fig 2
The modified audit process, with simplified and advanced versions making it suitable for the training of all healthcare workers

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Uganda Bureau of Statistics and ORC Macro. Uganda demographic and health survey 2000-2001. Entebbe: UBOS, ORC Macro, 2001.
    1. Jahn A, De Brouwere V. Referral in pregnancy and childbirth: concepts and strategies. Stud Health Services Organ Policy 2001;17: 229-46.
    1. Graham W, Wagaarachchi P, Penney G, McCaw-Binns A, Yeboah Antwi K, Hall MH. Criteria for clinical audit of the quality of hospital-based obstetric care in developing countries. Bull World Health Organ 2000;78: 614-20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Principles for best practice in clinical audit. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press, 2002.
    1. Berger A. Why doesn't audit work? BMJ 1998;316: 875-6. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types