Similar articles

• Peer review reviewed.

  [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Nature. 2007 Sep 13;449(7159):115. doi: 10.1038/449115a. Nature. 2007. PMID: 17851475 No abstract available.
• Federal work force. Can outsiders do better in managing NIH grants?

  Kaiser J. Kaiser J. Science. 2003 Mar 21;299(5614):1823. doi: 10.1126/science.299.5614.1823a. Science. 2003. PMID: 12649448 No abstract available.
• Biomedical politics. NIH roiled by inquiries over grants hit list.

  Kaiser J. Kaiser J. Science. 2003 Oct 31;302(5646):758. doi: 10.1126/science.302.5646.758. Science. 2003. PMID: 14593135 No abstract available.
• NIH revises rules of conflict of interest of grant peer reviewers.

  Shalev M. Shalev M. Lab Anim (NY). 2004 Mar;33(3):15-6. doi: 10.1038/laban0304-15. Lab Anim (NY). 2004. PMID: 15235618 Review. No abstract available.
• Careers in Science and Grant Administration: View from the National Institutes of Health.

  Zatz M, Dupere S. Zatz M, et al. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2018 Sep 4;10(9):a032847. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a032847. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2018. PMID: 30181194 Free PMC article. Review.