Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2003 Dec;87(12):1492-6.
doi: 10.1136/bjo.87.12.1492.

Intraocular pressure after replacement of current dual therapy with latanoprost monotherapy in patients with open angle glaucoma

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Intraocular pressure after replacement of current dual therapy with latanoprost monotherapy in patients with open angle glaucoma

L E Pillunat et al. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003 Dec.

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of replacing current dual ocular hypotensive therapy with latanoprost 0.005% monotherapy in patients with open angle glaucoma.

Methods: This randomised, open label, parallel group, multinational study included 466 patients with open angle glaucoma currently on dual ocular hypotensive therapy, including a beta adrenergic receptor antagonist. Patients were assigned (1:3) to ongoing dual therapy or a switch to monotherapy with latanoprost 0.005% once daily for 6 months. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured at 10 am and 5 pm at baseline, month 3, and month 6. Groups were compared for differences in diurnal IOP change, IOP success rates (IOP < or =22 mm Hg with < or =15% increase from baseline), and clinical success rates (not requiring change in therapy).

Results: Baseline mean diurnal IOP was 17.8 (SD 2.0) mm Hg in the latanoprost group and 17.6 (2.1) mm Hg in the dual therapy group. After 6 months, mean diurnal IOP was reduced by 0.26 (0.18) (SEM 1.4%) mm Hg (p=0.153) in the group switched to latanoprost and by 0.37 (0.25) (2.1%) mm Hg (p=0.138) in those continuing dual therapy (difference: 0.11 mm Hg; p=0.641). Success rates defined by IOP criteria were 83% for latanoprost and 89% for continued dual therapy (difference: 6%; p=0.122). Clinical success rates were 97% for latanoprost and 99% for dual therapy (difference: 2%; p=0.161). Ocular adverse events were reported by 23% of patients in both treatment groups.

Conclusion: Latanoprost monotherapy is a safe and effective alternative for many patients with open angle glaucoma requiring dual topical ocular hypotensive therapy for IOP control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) over the 6 months. Mean (SEM) is given.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Thylefors B, Negrel AD, Pararajasegaram R, et al. Global data on blindness. Bull World Health Organ 1995;73:115–21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Uusitalo RJ, Palkama A. Long-term evaluation of timolol. Acta Ophthalmol 1989;67:573–81. - PubMed
    1. Boger WP 3rd, Steinert RF, Puliafito CA, et al. Clinical trial comparing timolol ophthalmic solution to pilocarpine in open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1978;86:8–18. - PubMed
    1. Hartenbaum D. The efficacy of dorzolamide, a topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, in combination with timolol in the treatment of patients with open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Clin Ther 1996;18:460–5. - PubMed
    1. Zimmerman TJ, Canale P. Timolol—further observations. Ophthalmology 1979;86:166–9. - PubMed

MeSH terms