Use of restraints on dementia patients: an ethical dilemma of a nursing staff in Israel
- PMID: 14660939
- DOI: 10.1097/00128488-200312000-00007
Use of restraints on dementia patients: an ethical dilemma of a nursing staff in Israel
Abstract
This quality improvement project investigates the ethical dilemmas faced by nursing staff (ie, registered nurses, practical nurses, and nurse aids) using restraints for dementia patients in "realistic" and "idealistic" situations.
Rationale: There is a need to offer adequate care for a growing number of patients suffering from dementia and to ensure their safety. Restraints are a common practice for this purpose; however, they may inflict harm and contradict patient rights of freedom, autonomy, and respect. The issue becomes more complex in view of the multiple studies showing that the various justifications for using restraints are often based on caregiver interests and institutional considerations rather than on the patient's benefit.
Design: The project was conducted on a sample of 200 Israeli nursing staff members, half from internal medicine wards of 3 hospitals and the other half from 3 psychogeriatric nursing homes, all treating dementia patients. The project used a questionnaire composed of demographic data and an ethical preference questionnaire built on 18 situations concerning restraints. Situations were categorized into 3 purposes: (a) patient's benefit, (b) other patients' benefit, and (c) institutional benefit. These situations referred to realistic (ie, expressing views of daily practice) and idealistic (ie, expressing personal and professional beliefs and values) situations.
Results: The project exposes a discrepancy between the manner in which the nursing staff perceive use of restraints in an idealistic situation and in a realistic situation and the greater tendency to use restraints in the realistic situation than in the idealistic situation. The main contribution of the project is in revealing the conflict between the personal beliefs of the nursing staff and the nurses' perceptions of their institutional obligations.
Conclusions: The project uncovered a discrepancy among the beliefs, the personal and professional values of the nursing staff, and their perception regarding the actual use of restraints in the daily work routine.
Similar articles
-
The use of physical restraints for patients suffering from dementia.Nurs Ethics. 2003 Sep;10(5):512-25. doi: 10.1191/0969733003ne633oa. Nurs Ethics. 2003. PMID: 14529118
-
Solving ethically difficult care situations in nursing homes.Nurs Ethics. 2004 Nov;11(6):543-52. doi: 10.1191/0969733004ne737oa. Nurs Ethics. 2004. PMID: 15597935
-
Knowledge, Practice, and Attitude of Nursing Home Staff Toward the Use of Physical Restraint: Have They Changed Over Time?J Nurs Scholarsh. 2018 Sep;50(5):502-512. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12415. Epub 2018 Jul 29. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2018. PMID: 30058199
-
Registered nurses' knowledge, attitudes and practices of pain management for aged care residents with dementia: an integrative review.Contemp Nurse. 2024 Oct;60(5):496-515. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2024.2362290. Epub 2024 Jun 11. Contemp Nurse. 2024. PMID: 38861583 Review.
-
Nurse education to reduce physical restraints use in ICU: A scoping review.Nurs Crit Care. 2022 Nov;27(6):824-837. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12557. Epub 2020 Sep 23. Nurs Crit Care. 2022. PMID: 32969127
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical