Therapists as fixed versus random effects-some statistical and conceptual issues: a comment on Siemer and Joormann (2003)
- PMID: 14664686
- DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.8.4.518
Therapists as fixed versus random effects-some statistical and conceptual issues: a comment on Siemer and Joormann (2003)
Abstract
The authors disagree with M. Siemer and J. Joormann's assertion that therapist should be a fixed effect in psychotherapy treatment outcome studies. If treatment is properly standardized, therapist effects can be examined in preliminary tests and the therapist term deleted from analyses if such differences approach zero. If therapist effects are anticipated and either cannot be minimized through standardization or are specifically of interest because of the nature of the research question, the study has to be planned with adequate statistical power for including therapist as a random term. Simulation studies conducted by Siemer and Joormann confounded bias due to small sample size and inconsistent estimates.
Comment in
-
Assumptions and consequences of treating providers in therapy studies as fixed versus random effects: reply to Crits-Christoph, Tu, and Gallop (2003) and Serlin, Wampold, and Levin (2003).Psychol Methods. 2003 Dec;8(4):535-44. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.8.4.535. Psychol Methods. 2003. PMID: 14664688
Comment on
-
Power and measures of effect size in analysis of variance with fixed versus random nested factors.Psychol Methods. 2003 Dec;8(4):497-517. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.8.4.497. Psychol Methods. 2003. PMID: 14664685
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources