Factor structure, validity and reliability of the Cambridge Worry Scale in a pregnant population
- PMID: 14670208
- DOI: 10.1177/13591053030086008
Factor structure, validity and reliability of the Cambridge Worry Scale in a pregnant population
Abstract
This article presents the Cambridge Worry Scale (CWS), a content-based measure for assessing worries, and discusses its psychometric properties based on a longitudinal study of 1,207 pregnant women. Principal components analysis revealed a four-factor structure of women's concerns during pregnancy: socio-medical, own health, socio-economic and relational. The measure demonstrated good reliability and validity. Total CWS scores were strongly associated with state and trait anxiety (convergent validity) but also had significant and unique predictive value for mood outcomes (discriminant validity). The CWS discriminated better between women with different reproductive histories than measures of state and trait anxiety. We conclude that the CWS is a reliable and valid tool for assessing the extent and content of worries in specific situations.
Similar articles
-
Factor structure, validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the Cambridge Worry Scale.Midwifery. 2012 Feb;28(1):112-9. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.11.006. Epub 2011 Jan 17. Midwifery. 2012. PMID: 21247673
-
A survey of worries of pregnant women: reliability and validity of the Greek version of the Cambridge Worry Scale.Midwifery. 2012 Dec;28(6):746-53. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2011.09.004. Epub 2011 Oct 19. Midwifery. 2012. PMID: 22015218
-
Reliability and validity of the Cambridge Worry Scale in pregnant Turkish women.Midwifery. 2015 Mar;31(3):359-64. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2014.10.003. Epub 2014 Nov 6. Midwifery. 2015. PMID: 25467602
-
A review and psychometric evaluation of pregnancy-specific stress measures.J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2012 Jun;33(2):62-77. doi: 10.3109/0167482X.2012.673040. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2012. PMID: 22554138 Review.
-
Conceptualization, measurement, and effects of pregnancy-specific stress: review of research using the original and revised Prenatal Distress Questionnaire.J Behav Med. 2020 Feb;43(1):16-33. doi: 10.1007/s10865-019-00068-7. Epub 2019 Jun 10. J Behav Med. 2020. PMID: 31183596 Review.
Cited by
-
Sedentary behaviors and anxiety among children, adolescents and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Public Health. 2019 Apr 30;19(1):459. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6715-3. BMC Public Health. 2019. PMID: 31039760 Free PMC article.
-
Psychometric aspects of the Tilburg Pregnancy Distress Scale: data from the HAPPY study.Arch Womens Ment Health. 2020 Apr;23(2):215-219. doi: 10.1007/s00737-019-00974-4. Epub 2019 May 2. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2020. PMID: 31049709 Free PMC article.
-
Development of the Tilburg Pregnancy Distress Scale: the TPDS.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011 Oct 26;11:80. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-11-80. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011. PMID: 22029691 Free PMC article.
-
Swedish massage as an adjunct approach to Help suppOrt individuals Pregnant after Experiencing a prior Stillbirth (HOPES): a convergent parallel mixed-methods single-arm feasibility trial protocol.Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Apr 30;10(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01499-z. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024. PMID: 38689324 Free PMC article.
-
Correlates of poor mental health in early pregnancy in obese European women.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Dec 4;17(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1595-y. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017. PMID: 29202779 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical