Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2003 Dec;13(4):207-18.
doi: 10.1023/a:1026264519996.

Test-retest reliability of the Isernhagen Work Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Test-retest reliability of the Isernhagen Work Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain

S Brouwer et al. J Occup Rehabil. 2003 Dec.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate test-retest reliability of the Isernhagen Work System Functional Capacity Evaluation (IWS FCE) in a sample of patients (n = 30) suffering from Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) and selected for rehabilitation treatment. The IWS FCE consists of 28 tests that reflect work-related activities like lifting, carrying, bending, etc. In this study, a slightly modified IWS FCE was used. Patients were included in the study if they were still at work or were less than 1 year out of work because of CLBP. Participants' mean age was 40 years, the duration of low back pain ranged between 5 and 10 years. Fifteen patients (50%) were out of work for a mean of 17 weeks, and they all received financial compensation. Two FCE sessions were held with a 2-week interval in between. Means per session, 95% confidence intervals of the mean difference, one-way random Intra Class Correlations (ICC), limits of agreement, Cohen's kappa and percentage of absolute agreement were calculated where appropriate. An ICC of 0.75 or more, a kappa value of more than 0.60 and a percentage of absolute agreement of 80% were considered as an acceptable reliability. Tests of the IWC FCE were divided into tests with and tests without an acceptable test-retest reliability on the basis of the kappa values, the percentage of absolute agreement and the ICC values. Fifteen tests (79%) showed an acceptable test-retest reliability based on Kappa values and percentage of absolute agreement. Eleven tests (61%) showed an acceptable test-retest reliability based on ICC values.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Work. 2002;18(1):23-7 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10 - PubMed
    1. Phys Ther. 1998 Aug;78(8):852-66 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Sep;48(9):1123-32 - PubMed
    1. Comput Biol Med. 1989;19(1):61-70 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources