Group prenatal care and preterm birth weight: results from a matched cohort study at public clinics
- PMID: 14672486
- DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00765-8
Group prenatal care and preterm birth weight: results from a matched cohort study at public clinics
Abstract
Objective: To examine the impact of group versus individual prenatal care on birth weight and gestational age.
Methods: This prospective, matched cohort study included pregnant women (N = 458) entering prenatal care at 24 or less weeks' gestation; one half received group prenatal care with women of the same gestational age. Women were matched by clinic, age, race, parity, and infant birth date. Women were predominantly black and Hispanic of low socioeconomic status, served by one of three public clinics in Atlanta, Georgia or New Haven, Connecticut.
Results: Birth weight was greater for infants of women in group versus individual prenatal care (P < .01). Among those born preterm, infants of group patients were significantly larger than infants of individual-care patients (mean, 2398 versus 1990 g, P < .05). Although not statistically significant, infants of group patients were less likely than those of individual-care patients to be low birth weight (less than 2500 g; 16 versus 23 infants); very low birth weight (less than 1500 g; three versus six infants); early preterm (less than 33 weeks; two versus seven infants); or to experience neonatal loss (none versus three infants). There were no differences in number of prenatal visits or other risk characteristics (patient age, race, prior preterm birth).
Conclusions: Group prenatal care results in higher birth weight, especially for infants delivered preterm. Group prenatal care provides a structural innovation, permitting more time for provider-patient interaction and therefore the opportunity to address clinical as well as psychological, social, and behavioral factors to promote healthy pregnancy. Results have implications for design of sustainable prenatal services that might contribute to reduction of racial disparities in adverse perinatal outcomes.
Similar articles
-
Prenatal care, birth outcomes and newborn hospitalization costs: patterns among Hispanics in New Jersey.Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 Jul-Aug;30(4):182-7, 200. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998. PMID: 9711457
-
Patterns of birth weight in relation to gestational age, maternal age, parity, and prenatal care in Texas' triethnic population, 1984 through 1986.Tex Med. 1993 Dec;89(12):51-6. Tex Med. 1993. PMID: 8178306
-
Group Prenatal Care Reduces Risk of Preterm Birth and Low Birth Weight: A Matched Cohort Study.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Jan;28(1):17-22. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6817. Epub 2018 Sep 25. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019. PMID: 30256700
-
Impact of low-dose aspirin on adverse perinatal outcome: meta-analysis and meta-regression.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;55(2):157-169. doi: 10.1002/uog.20859. Epub 2020 Jan 8. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 31479546 Review.
-
The cost of prematurity: hospital charges at birth and frequency of rehospitalizations and acute care visits over the first year of life: a comparison by gestational age and birth weight.Am J Nurs. 2005 Jul;105(7):56-64; quiz 65. doi: 10.1097/00000446-200507000-00031. Am J Nurs. 2005. PMID: 15995395 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Group Care in the first 1000 days: implementation and process evaluation of contextually adapted antenatal and postnatal group care targeting diverse vulnerable populations in high-, middle- and low-resource settings.Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Nov 24;3(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00370-7. Implement Sci Commun. 2022. PMID: 36424641 Free PMC article.
-
Improved Outcomes for Hispanic Women with Gestational Diabetes Using the Centering Pregnancy© Group Prenatal Care Model.Matern Child Health J. 2017 Feb;21(2):297-305. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-2114-x. Matern Child Health J. 2017. PMID: 27423239
-
Group versus traditional prenatal care in low-risk women delivering at term: a retrospective cohort study.J Perinatol. 2017 Jul;37(7):769-771. doi: 10.1038/jp.2017.33. Epub 2017 Mar 30. J Perinatol. 2017. PMID: 28358385 Free PMC article.
-
Perceptions of Barriers and Facilitators During Implementation of a Complex Model of Group Prenatal Care in Six Urban Sites.Res Nurs Health. 2015 Dec;38(6):462-74. doi: 10.1002/nur.21681. Epub 2015 Sep 4. Res Nurs Health. 2015. PMID: 26340483 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Changes in Socioeconomic Inequality of Low Birth Weight and Macrosomia in Shaanxi Province of Northwest China, 2010-2013: A Cross-sectional Study.Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Feb;95(5):e2471. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002471. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016. PMID: 26844457 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical