Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis: single-level and bi-level
- PMID: 14673368
- DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000099392.90849.AA
Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis: single-level and bi-level
Abstract
Study design: Prospective, concurrently enrolled, multicenter trials of the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Memphis, TN) were conducted for the treatment of patients with single-level and two-level (bi-level) degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine.
Objectives: The studies were designed to determine whether new functional intervertebral cervical disc prosthesis can provide relief from objective neurologic symptoms and signs, improve the patient's ability to perform activities of daily living, decrease pain, and maintain stability and segmental motion.
Summary of background data: The concept of accelerated degeneration of adjacent disc levels as a consequence of increased stress caused by interbody fusion of the cervical spine has been widely postulated. Therefore, reconstruction of a failed intervertebral disc with functional disc prosthesis should offer the same benefits as fusion while simultaneously providing motion and thereby protecting the adjacent level discs from the abnormal stresses associated with fusion.
Methods: Patients with symptomatic cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy underwent implantation with the Bryan prosthesis after a standard anterior cervical discectomy. At scheduled follow-up periods, the effectiveness of the device was characterized by evaluating each patient's pain, neurologic function, and radiographically measured range of motion at the implanted level.
Results: Clinical success for both studies exceeded the study acceptance criteria of 85%. At 1-year follow-up, the flexion-extension range of motion per level: Discectomy and implantation of the device alleviates neurologic symptoms and signs similar to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Radiographic evidence supports maintenance of motion. The procedure is safe and the patients recover quickly. At least 5 years of follow-up will be needed to assess the long-term functionality of the prosthesis and protective influence on adjacent levels.
Similar articles
-
Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis.Neurosurgery. 2002 Sep;51(3):840-5; discussion 845-7. doi: 10.1227/00006123-200209000-00048. Neurosurgery. 2002. PMID: 12188968 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases.Eur Spine J. 2009 Feb;18(2):218-31. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0854-z. Epub 2009 Jan 6. Eur Spine J. 2009. PMID: 19127374 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Feb;21(1):19-22. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180500778. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008. PMID: 18418131 Clinical Trial.
-
Early clinical and biomechanical results following cervical arthroplasty.Neurosurg Focus. 2004 Sep 15;17(3):E9. doi: 10.3171/foc.2004.17.3.9. Neurosurg Focus. 2004. PMID: 15636565 Review.
-
Cervical total disk replacement: complications and avoidance.Orthop Clin North Am. 2012 Jan;43(1):97-107, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2011.08.006. Epub 2011 Oct 22. Orthop Clin North Am. 2012. PMID: 22082633 Review.
Cited by
-
Adjacent segment degenerative disease: is it due to disease progression or a fusion-associated phenomenon? Comparison between segments adjacent to the fused and non-fused segments.Eur Spine J. 2011 Nov;20(11):1940-5. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1864-9. Epub 2011 Jun 8. Eur Spine J. 2011. PMID: 21656051 Free PMC article.
-
Adjacent-level degeneration after cervical disc arthroplasty versus fusion.Eur Spine J. 2011 Aug;20 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):403-7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1916-1. Epub 2011 Jul 28. Eur Spine J. 2011. PMID: 21796395 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Is cervical disc arthroplasty superior to fusion for treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease? A meta-analysis.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jun;471(6):1904-19. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2830-0. Epub 2013 Feb 7. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013. PMID: 23389804 Free PMC article.
-
Multilevel cervical arthroplasty-clinical and radiological outcomes.J Spine Surg. 2020 Mar;6(1):233-242. doi: 10.21037/jss.2020.01.09. J Spine Surg. 2020. PMID: 32309661 Free PMC article.
-
The prevalence of heterotopic ossification among patients after cervical artificial disc replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jun;96(24):e7163. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007163. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017. PMID: 28614250 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials