Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2004 Jan;90(1):77-81.
doi: 10.1136/heart.90.1.77.

Balloon aortic valvoplasty in paediatric patients: progressive aortic regurgitation is common

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Balloon aortic valvoplasty in paediatric patients: progressive aortic regurgitation is common

C Balmer et al. Heart. 2004 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate immediate and midterm results after balloon valvoplasty in a paediatric population with congenital aortic stenosis, giving special consideration to aortic regurgitation.

Design: Retrospective study.

Setting: Two tertiary referral centres for paediatric cardiology.

Patients: 70 consecutive patients, with an age range of 0-16.4 years. Group A infants < 3 months old (n = 21). Group B children > 3 months old (n = 49). Median follow up time was 19.8 months, range 0-158 months.

Intervention: All patients underwent balloon aortic valvoplasty. The balloon to annulus ratio was selected at a mean of 0.90 (range 0.67-1.0).

Main outcome measures: Doppler gradients and degree of aortic regurgitation.

Results: The pressure gradient dropped significantly with the intervention and increased mildly at follow up. Freedom from relevant aortic regurgitation (that is, moderate and severe) was initially lower in group A (75% v 90% after one month) but after two years the difference between the two groups was not significant (50% v 61%). Freedom from reintervention was significantly lower in group A (with 35% v 80%) after three years.

Conclusion: Aortic balloon valvoplasty is safe and effective but has a high rate of early reintervention in infants with critical aortic stenosis. The major long term problem is progressive aortic regurgitation, which does not seem to be prevented by the use of small balloons.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Instantaneous maximum Doppler gradient before and immediately after balloon valvoplasty and at latest follow up. Open columns: group A, infants < 3 months old, n  =  21. Grey columns: group B, children > 3 months old, n  =  49. Values are mean (SD).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Freedom from moderate and severe aortic regurgitation in group A (squares, n  =  21) and group B (triangles, n  =  49).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Freedom from reintervention in group A (squares, n  =  21) and group B (triangles, n  =  49).

Comment in

References

    1. Rocchini AP, Beekman RH, Ben Shachar G, et al. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty: results of the valvuloplasty and angioplasty of congenital anomalies registry. Am J Cardiol 1990;65:784–9. - PubMed
    1. Justo RN, McCrindle BW, Benson LN, et al. Aortic valve regurgitation after surgical versus percutaneous balloon valvotomy for congenital aortic valve stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1996;77:1332–8. - PubMed
    1. Hawkins JA, Minich LL, Shaddy RE, et al. Aortic valve repair and replacement after balloon aortic valvuloplasty in children. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:1355–8. - PubMed
    1. Bacha EA, Satou GM, Moran AM, et al. Valve-sparing operation for balloon-induced aortic regurgitation in congenital aortic stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;122:162–8. - PubMed
    1. Sholler GF, Keane JF, Perry SB, et al. Balloon dilatation of congenital aortic valve stenosis. Circulation 1988;78:351–60. - PubMed

MeSH terms