Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to enamel
- PMID: 14677612
Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to enamel
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the microtensile bond strength (microTBS) to enamel of 10 contemporary adhesives, including three one-step self-etch systems, four two-step self-etch systems and three two-step total-etch systems, with that of a conventional three-step total-etch adhesive.
Methods: Resin composite (Z100, 3M) was bonded to flat, #600-grit wet-sanded enamel surfaces of 18 extracted human third molars using the adhesives strictly according to the respective manufacturer's instructions. After storage overnight in 37 degrees C water, the bonded specimens were sectioned into 2-4 thin slabs of approximately 1 mm thickness and 2.5 mm width. They were then trimmed into an hourglass shape with an interface area of approximately 1 mm2, and subsequently subjected to microTBS-testing with a cross-head speed of 1 mm/minute.
Results: The microTBS to enamel varied from 3.2 MPa for the experimental one-step self-etch adhesive PQ/Universal (self-etch) to 43.9 MPa for the two-step total-etch adhesive Scotchbond 1. When compared with the conventional three-step total-etch adhesive OptiBond FL, the bond strengths of most adhesives with simplified application procedures were not significantly different, except for two one-step self-etch adhesives, experimental PQ/Universal (self-etch) and One-up Bond F, that showed lower bond strengths. Specimen failures during sample preparation were recorded for the latter adhesives as well.
Similar articles
-
Microtensile bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin.Am J Dent. 2003 Dec;16(6):414-20. Am J Dent. 2003. PMID: 15002958
-
Enamel bond strengths of pairs of adhesives from the same manufacturer.Oper Dent. 2005 Jul-Aug;30(4):492-9. Oper Dent. 2005. PMID: 16130870 Clinical Trial.
-
Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin.Dent Mater. 2007 Jan;23(1):71-80. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.12.002. Epub 2006 Jan 19. Dent Mater. 2007. PMID: 16426673
-
Dental adhesives in contemporary restorative dentistry.Dent Clin North Am. 1998 Oct;42(4):567-77. Dent Clin North Am. 1998. PMID: 9891640 Review.
-
State of the art of self-etch adhesives.Dent Mater. 2011 Jan;27(1):17-28. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.023. Epub 2010 Nov 24. Dent Mater. 2011. PMID: 21109301 Review.
Cited by
-
Shear bond strength of one-step self-etch adhesives: pH influence.Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2015 May-Jun;12(3):209-14. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2015. PMID: 26005459 Free PMC article.
-
Characterization of an Experimental Two-Step Self-Etch Adhesive's Bonding Performance and Resin-Dentin Interfacial Properties.Polymers (Basel). 2021 Mar 25;13(7):1009. doi: 10.3390/polym13071009. Polymers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33805907 Free PMC article.
-
Correlation between bond strength and nanomechanical properties of adhesive interface.Clin Oral Investig. 2017 May;21(4):1055-1062. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1847-7. Epub 2016 May 25. Clin Oral Investig. 2017. PMID: 27221518
-
Comparative Evaluation of Microtensile Bond Strength of Three Adhesive Systems.Front Dent. 2022 Feb 6;19:8. doi: 10.18502/fid.v19i8.8725. eCollection 2022. Front Dent. 2022. PMID: 35937153 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of previous acid etching on interface morphology and bond strength of self-etching adhesive to cavosurface enamel.Eur J Dent. 2012 Jan;6(1):56-62. Eur J Dent. 2012. PMID: 22229008 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Miscellaneous