Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2004 Jan;239(1):87-92.
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000103063.82181.2c.

Survival following liver transplantation from non-heart-beating donors

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Survival following liver transplantation from non-heart-beating donors

Peter L Abt et al. Ann Surg. 2004 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether patient and graft survival following transplantation with non-heart-beating donor (NHBD) hepatic allografts is equivalent to heart-beating-donor (HBD) allografts.

Summary background data: With the growing disparity between the number of patients awaiting liver transplantation and a limited supply of cadaveric organs, there is renewed interest in the use of hepatic allografts from NHBDs. Limited outcome data addressing this issue exist.

Methods: Retrospective evaluation of graft and patient survival among adult recipients of NHBD hepatic allografts compared with recipients of HBD livers between 1993 and 2001 using the United Network of Organ Sharing database.

Results: NHBD (N = 144) graft survival was significantly shorter than HBD grafts (N = 26856). One- and 3-year graft survival was 70.2% and 63.3% for NHBD recipients versus 80.4% and 72.1% (P = 0.003 and P = 0.012) for HBD recipients. Recipients of an NHBD graft had a greater incidence of primary nonfunction (11.8 vs. 6.4%, P = 0.008) and retransplantation (13.9% vs. 8.3%, P = 0.04) compared with HBD recipients. Prolonged cold ischemic time and recipient life support were predictors of early graft failure among recipients of NHBD livers. Although differences in patient survival following NHBD versus HBD transplant did not meet statistical significance, a strong trend was evident that likely has relevant clinical implications.

Conclusions: Graft and patient survival is inferior among recipients of NHBD livers. NHBD donors remain an important source of hepatic grafts; however, judicious use is warranted, including minimization of cold ischemia and use in stable recipients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
FIGURE 1. Number of liver transplants from NHBDs performed per year.
None
FIGURE 2. Kaplan-Meier graft survival for NHBDs and HBDs. NHBD graft survival (dotted line) was significantly less than HBD survival (solid line) at 1 (70.2 vs. 80.4%, P = 0.003) and 3 years (63.3 vs. 72.1%, P = 0.012).
None
FIGURE 3. Kaplan-Meier patient survival for NHBDs and HBDs. NHBD patient survival (dotted line) was similar to HBD (solid line) at 1 (79.7 vs. 85.0%, P = 0.082) and 3 years (72.1 vs. 77.4%, P = 0.146).
None
FIGURE 4. Kaplan-Meier NHBD graft survival for controlled donors (N = 117, solid line), uncontrolled donors (N = 11, small dashes), and unidentified patients (N = 16, large dashes).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. U.S. Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. 2000 Annual Report. February 16, 2001.
    1. Kootstra GG, Daemen JH, Oomen AP. Categories of non-heart-beating donors. Transplant Proc. 1995;27:2893–2894. - PubMed
    1. Kootstra G, Arnold RM, Bos MA, et al. Round table discussion on non-heart-beating donors. Transplant Proc. 1995;27:2935–2939.
    1. Herdman R, Potts JT. Non-Heart-Beating Organ Transplantation: Medical and Ethical Issues in Procurement. Institute of Medicine, 1997. - PubMed
    1. Koogler T, Costarino AT. The potential benefits of the pediatric nonheartbeating donor. Pediatrics. 1998;101:1049–1052. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms