Alabama coronary artery bypass grafting project: results from phase II of a statewide quality improvement initiative
- PMID: 14685107
- PMCID: PMC1356199
- DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000103065.17661.8f
Alabama coronary artery bypass grafting project: results from phase II of a statewide quality improvement initiative
Abstract
Objective/background: This report describes the first round of results for Phase II of the Alabama CABG Project, a regional quality improvement initiative.
Methods: Charts submitted by all hospitals in Alabama performing CABG (ICD-9 codes 36.10-36.20) were reviewed by a Clinical Data Abstraction Center (CDAC) (preintervention 1999-2000; postintervention 2000-2001). Variables that described quality in Phase I were abstracted for Phase II and data describing the new variables of beta-blocker use and lipid management were collected. Data samples collected onsite by participating hospitals were used for rapid cycle improvement in Phase II.
Results: CDAC data (n = 1927 cases in 1999; n = 2001 cases in 2000) showed that improvements from Phase I in aspirin prescription, internal mammary artery use, and duration of intubation persisted in Phase II. During Phase II, use of beta-blockers before, during, or after CABG increased from 65% to 76% of patients (P < 0.05). Appropriate lipid management, an aggregate variable, occurred in 91% of patients before and 91% after the educational intervention. However, there were improvements in 3 of 5 subcategories for lipid management (documenting a lipid disorder [52%-57%], initiating drug therapy [45%-53%], and dietary counseling [74%-91%]; P < 0.05).
Conclusions: In Phase II, this statewide process-oriented quality improvement program added two new measures of quality. Achievements of quality improvement from Phase I persisted in Phase II, and improvements were seen in the new variables of lipid management and perioperative use of beta-blockers.
Figures
References
-
- Holman WL, Peterson ED, Athanasuleas CL, et al. Alabama coronary artery bypass grafting cooperative project: baseline data. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:1592–1598. - PubMed
-
- Holman WL, Allman RM, Sansom M, et al. Alabama coronary artery bypass grafting project: results of a statewide quality improvement initiative. JAMA. 2001;285:3003–3010. - PubMed
-
- Boylan MJ, Lytle BW, Loop FD, et al. Surgical treatment of isolated left anterior descending coronary stenosis: comparison of left internal mammary artery and venous autograft at 18 to 20 years of follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;107:657–662. - PubMed
-
- Cohn LH. Use of the internal mammary artery graft and in-hospital mortality and other adverse outcomes associated with coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation. 2001;103:483–484. - PubMed
-
- Mangano DT, Layug EL, Wallace A, et al. Effect of atenolol on mortality and cardiovascular morbidity after noncardiac surgery. N Engl 9J Med. 1996;335:1713–1720. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
